was reported in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was reported in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referencing information that has been published or disclosed in a specific source, such as a news article, journal, or report. Example: "The findings of the study were reported in the latest edition of the scientific journal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Titov was reported in "good" condition.

The New York Times

"It was reported in Vogue".

The Guardian

The base type support was reported in.

University of California, Berkeley

Radiation injury was reported in one patient.

Stanford University

A third case was reported in Niagara Falls.

Independent

The work was reported in Nature.

The New York Times - Science

It was reported in the media, too.

The Guardian - Arts

Martin was reported in the immediate aftermath.

The Guardian - Sport

No fighting was reported in the incursion.

The New York Times

No widespread panic was reported, in fact.

The New York Times - Tech

The discovery was reported in Science.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was reported in", ensure the source is credible and relevant to the information being conveyed. This adds weight to your statement and builds trust with your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "was reported in" to cite information from a source that is already reporting on another source. Always try to cite the original source to ensure accuracy and avoid potential misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was reported in" serves as an introductory phrase that attributes information or events to a specific source. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's a common and acceptable way to cite information found in various media.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was reported in" is a versatile phrase used to attribute information to a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across diverse contexts, including news, academic research, and general discussions. When using this phrase, it is crucial to ensure the cited source is credible and relevant to bolster the reliability of your statement. While widely accepted, it's also advisable to avoid relying on secondary reporting and instead cite the original source whenever possible. Alternatives such as "was mentioned in" or "was documented in" can provide subtle variations in tone and emphasis. Finally, consider if you are using an authoritative source to give more credibility to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was mentioned in

Changes the verb from "reported" to "mentioned", indicating a less formal or detailed reference.

was noted in

Similar to "was mentioned", but implies a more observant or attentive recording of the information.

was documented in

Emphasizes the formal recording or written evidence of the information.

was disclosed in

Suggests that the information was previously private or confidential before being revealed in the specified source.

was revealed in

Similar to "disclosed", but often implies a more dramatic or surprising unveiling of the information.

was published in

Highlights the act of making the information available to the public through a formal publication.

appeared in

Indicates that the information was present or featured in the source.

was featured in

Suggests that the information was prominently displayed or highlighted in the source.

was covered in

Indicates that the source provided detailed or comprehensive information about the topic.

as stated in

Focuses on the authority or credibility of the source as the basis for the information.

FAQs

How can I use "was reported in" in a sentence?

Use "was reported in" to introduce information you've learned from a specific source. For example, "The study's findings "was reported in" the New England Journal of Medicine".

What's a formal alternative to "was reported in"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was documented in" or "was disclosed in".

How does "was reported in" differ from "was mentioned in"?

"Was reported in" implies a more detailed or significant coverage of the information, whereas "was mentioned in" suggests a brief or passing reference.

Is it okay to use "was reported in" when referencing Wikipedia?

While you can say something ""was reported in" Wikipedia", keep in mind that Wikipedia is not always considered a reliable source. It's best to verify the information with a more authoritative source if possible.