Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was documented in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was documented in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a source or record where information has been officially recorded or noted. Example: "The findings of the research were documented in the annual report published by the organization."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Her campaign was documented in an award-winning 2008 documentary Pray the Devil Back to Hell.
News & Media
This painful episode was documented in Leslie Woodhead's film Saving Jazz.
News & Media
OI was documented in 38 patients (20%).
Science
Suicidality was documented in 70 patients (31.8 %).
Digital or limb necrosis was documented in 6 patients (5.7%).
Science
Microbiological evidence of infection was documented in 174 (49.5 %) patients.
Science
Dialogue with family was documented in most cases (98).
Functional improvement following GH therapy was documented in some studies.
Widespread abuse was documented in a UN report in February.
News & Media
Their action was documented in the film "Fires of Kuwait".
News & Media
Heavy rainfall, peaking at 1090 mm, was documented in Taiwan.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was documented in", ensure that the source you are referencing is reliable and authoritative to lend credibility to your statement.
Common error
While "was documented in" is grammatically sound, avoid overusing passive voice in your writing. Consider active voice alternatives if they provide more clarity and directness, such as "The report documented..." instead of "It was documented in the report that..."
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was documented in" primarily functions as a passive construction used to indicate that information has been recorded or reported in a specific source. As Ludwig AI explains, it confirms that evidence exists in a particular record. This phrase allows writers to cite evidence without explicitly stating who did the documenting.
Frequent in
Science
67%
News & Media
28%
Wiki
3%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was documented in" is a grammatically correct and very common construction used to indicate that information has been formally recorded in a specific source. According to Ludwig AI, it's a valid and useful phrase in written English. Its primary function is to provide evidence and support for a statement, most frequently appearing in scientific and news contexts. While generally formal, writers should be mindful of overusing the passive voice and consider active alternatives for clarity. When using this phrase, ensure you are citing reliable sources to maintain the credibility of your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was recorded in
Replaces 'documented' with 'recorded', suggesting a more straightforward act of noting information.
was detailed in
Emphasizes that something was described with a high level of detail.
was registered in
Similar to 'recorded' but often implies an official or formal listing.
was chronicled in
Implies that something was recorded over a period, often in a historical context.
was archived in
Emphasizes that something was preserved or stored in a specific repository or system.
was cataloged in
Suggests that something has been systematically listed as part of a collection or database.
was reported in
Indicates that information was conveyed or announced in a specific source or publication.
was evidenced in
Focuses on the presence of proof or indication within a particular source.
was illustrated in
Highlights that something was clarified or explained through examples or visuals.
was shown in
Indicates that something was displayed or revealed in a particular context or source.
FAQs
What does "was documented in" mean?
The phrase "was documented in" indicates that something has been formally recorded or reported in a specific source, such as a report, study, or film. It signifies that evidence or information exists in a written or visual record.
What are some alternatives to "was documented in"?
Alternatives to "was documented in" include phrases like "was recorded in", "was reported in", or "was detailed in", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying something "was documented in"?
While "was documented in" is passive, using the active voice (e.g., "The study documented...") can often create a more direct and concise sentence. The best choice depends on the desired emphasis and flow of your writing.
How can I use "was documented in" in a sentence?
You can use "was documented in" to cite a source where information is formally recorded. For example, "The increase in sales "was documented in" the quarterly report".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested