Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was documented in

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was documented in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a source or record where information has been officially recorded or noted. Example: "The findings of the research were documented in the annual report published by the organization."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Her campaign was documented in an award-winning 2008 documentary Pray the Devil Back to Hell.

News & Media

The Guardian

This painful episode was documented in Leslie Woodhead's film Saving Jazz.

OI was documented in 38 patients (20%).

Suicidality was documented in 70 patients (31.8 %).

Digital or limb necrosis was documented in 6 patients (5.7%).

Microbiological evidence of infection was documented in 174 (49.5 %) patients.

Dialogue with family was documented in most cases (98).

Functional improvement following GH therapy was documented in some studies.

Widespread abuse was documented in a UN report in February.

News & Media

BBC

Their action was documented in the film "Fires of Kuwait".

News & Media

Huffington Post

Heavy rainfall, peaking at 1090 mm, was documented in Taiwan.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was documented in", ensure that the source you are referencing is reliable and authoritative to lend credibility to your statement.

Common error

While "was documented in" is grammatically sound, avoid overusing passive voice in your writing. Consider active voice alternatives if they provide more clarity and directness, such as "The report documented..." instead of "It was documented in the report that..."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was documented in" primarily functions as a passive construction used to indicate that information has been recorded or reported in a specific source. As Ludwig AI explains, it confirms that evidence exists in a particular record. This phrase allows writers to cite evidence without explicitly stating who did the documenting.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

28%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was documented in" is a grammatically correct and very common construction used to indicate that information has been formally recorded in a specific source. According to Ludwig AI, it's a valid and useful phrase in written English. Its primary function is to provide evidence and support for a statement, most frequently appearing in scientific and news contexts. While generally formal, writers should be mindful of overusing the passive voice and consider active alternatives for clarity. When using this phrase, ensure you are citing reliable sources to maintain the credibility of your writing.

FAQs

What does "was documented in" mean?

The phrase "was documented in" indicates that something has been formally recorded or reported in a specific source, such as a report, study, or film. It signifies that evidence or information exists in a written or visual record.

What are some alternatives to "was documented in"?

Alternatives to "was documented in" include phrases like "was recorded in", "was reported in", or "was detailed in", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying something "was documented in"?

While "was documented in" is passive, using the active voice (e.g., "The study documented...") can often create a more direct and concise sentence. The best choice depends on the desired emphasis and flow of your writing.

How can I use "was documented in" in a sentence?

You can use "was documented in" to cite a source where information is formally recorded. For example, "The increase in sales "was documented in" the quarterly report".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: