was reported by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was reported by" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to attribute information or a statement to a specific source, usually a person or entity that provided the information. Some examples of how it can be used include: - According to the news article, the recent increase in crime rates was reported by the local police department. - The new tax proposal was reported by the finance minister during his speech to the parliament. - A groundbreaking study on climate change was reported by a team of scientists in the latest issue of the scientific journal. - The company's financial losses were reported by the CEO in their quarterly earnings call with investors. In each of these examples, "was reported by" is used to indicate who provided the information being discussed.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The decision was reported by DNAinfo.com.

The New York Times

It was reported by four people.

The New Yorker

That figure was reported by Politico.

The New York Times

The deal was reported by Deadline.com.com

The New York Times - Arts

SPV was reported by 45.5% of women.

Harvard University

The increase was reported by the Economics Daily.

The New York Times

It was reported by The Washington Post.

The New York Times

This article was reported by Richard G.

The New York Times

The decision was reported by AirForceTimes.com.

The New York Times

A prior stroke was reported by 12%.

American Heart Journal

Mr. Holliday's departure was reported by AdAge.com.com

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was reported by", ensure the source is credible and accurately represents the information. Provide specific details about the source to enhance reliability.

Common error

Avoid using "was reported by" without specifying the source. Unattributed reporting can weaken credibility and create ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was reported by" functions as a passive reporting verb phrase, attributing information to a specific source. It's a common way to indicate where information originated, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Science

15%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was reported by" is a versatile phrase used to attribute information to a specific source, enhancing credibility and transparency. It is grammatically correct and commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, as Ludwig AI confirms. When using this phrase, ensure the source is reputable and accurately cited. While alternatives like ""was stated by"" or ""was mentioned by"" exist, the core function remains the same: to provide verifiable sourcing for the information presented. Remember to avoid vague references and always specify the source for maximum clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed by

Substitutes 'reported' with 'confirmed', indicating that the information has been verified as true.

was stated by

Substitutes 'reported' with 'stated', implying a more formal and direct declaration.

was mentioned by

Replaces 'reported' with 'mentioned', suggesting a less formal or detailed communication of information.

was announced by

Uses 'announced' instead of 'reported', focusing on the act of making something publicly known.

was disclosed by

Uses 'disclosed' instead of 'reported', suggesting a deliberate act of making information available.

was documented by

Replaces 'reported' with 'documented', emphasizing that the information has been recorded in writing.

was revealed by

Replaces 'reported' with 'revealed', indicating that the information was previously unknown or secret.

was communicated by

Uses 'communicated' instead of 'reported', emphasizing the act of conveying information.

was indicated by

Substitutes 'reported' with 'indicated', focusing on evidence or signs that suggest something is the case.

was noted by

Replaces 'reported' with 'noted', suggesting a casual or incidental observation.

FAQs

How can I use "was reported by" in a sentence?

Use "was reported by" to attribute information to a specific source. For example, "The study's findings "were reported by" the New England Journal of Medicine."

What are some alternatives to "was reported by"?

Alternatives include "was stated by", "was mentioned by", or "was confirmed by", depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when attributing information?

While both active and passive voices are acceptable, using the active voice (e.g. "The New York Times reported") can often make the sentence more direct and engaging than the passive voice ("was reported by The New York Times").

Which is more credible, "was reported by sources" or "was reported by The New York Times"?

"Was reported by The New York Times" is more credible because it provides a specific and reputable source, whereas "was reported by sources" is vague and lacks authority.