was remarkable for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was remarkable for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to highlight a specific quality or characteristic that stands out in a person, event, or object. Example: "The painting was remarkable for its vibrant colors and intricate details."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Hesperornis was remarkable for three features.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The list was remarkable for two reasons.

The Guardian

Riggleman's departure was remarkable for its timing.

The New York Times - Sports

"It was remarkable for being so quiet.

The Guardian

The prediction was remarkable for a couple of reasons.

The New York Times

In fact, Cruz's campaign was remarkable for its consistency.

The Guardian

Tamil devotional poetry was remarkable for a number of reasons.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was remarkable for being knitted and having zipped ankles.

The Guardian - Opinion

His distinguished 52-year career was remarkable for its breadth.

The New York Times

Yet 2016 was remarkable for many other reasons – good and bad.

The Guardian

Tunisia's election in October, hailed as a model, was remarkable for its civility.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was remarkable for" to draw attention to specific, noteworthy qualities or aspects of a subject, event, or object. Be specific about what made it remarkable.

Common error

Avoid using "was remarkable for" as a generic compliment. Instead, always specify the particular attribute or detail that made something noteworthy to provide informative value.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was remarkable for" serves as a descriptive expression. It functions to highlight specific qualities or characteristics of a subject that are considered noteworthy or exceptional. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, showing it's used to emphasize specific aspects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

34%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was remarkable for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to spotlight specific, noteworthy attributes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in various contexts. It is best employed when you wish to emphasize exceptional qualities, but avoid overuse to maintain its impact. The phrase sees prevalent use in news, scientific, and encyclopedia sources, reflecting a formal to neutral register.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was noteworthy because of

Focuses on the cause of noteworthiness, emphasizing the reason behind its significance.

was distinguished by

Emphasizes a unique quality that sets something apart from others.

was notable for

Highlights something deserving attention or easily noticed.

stood out due to

Indicates prominence or distinctiveness resulting from a specific factor.

was exceptional in

Stresses the high quality or unusual nature of something in a particular aspect.

was significant for

Highlights the importance or consequence of something.

was impressive because

Focuses on the admirable or awe-inspiring quality of something.

was striking in

Emphasizes a noticeable or visually appealing quality.

was prominent for

Indicates a well-known or easily recognized feature.

excelled in

Highlights superior performance or skill in a specific area.

FAQs

How can I use "was remarkable for" in a sentence?

Use "was remarkable for" to highlight a specific quality or characteristic. For instance, "The athlete "was remarkable for" his speed and agility."

What are some alternatives to "was remarkable for"?

Alternatives include "was noteworthy for", "was distinguished by", or "was notable for", depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was remarkable for" or "was known for"?

"Was remarkable for" emphasizes something exceptional or unusual, while "was known for" simply indicates something that is generally recognized. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight something extraordinary or merely acknowledge a common attribute.

What does it mean when something "was remarkable for" a particular reason?

It means that something had a quality or characteristic that was especially noteworthy or outstanding in some way. It suggests that the reason made it stand out from others.