was notable for

USAGE SUMMARY

"was notable for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to indicate something that was remarkable or particularly noteworthy. For example, "The concert was notable for its incredible energy and enthusiasm."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Yellen's appearance was notable for its non-notability.

The Guardian - Business

Yet it was notable for two reasons.

The Economist

The election was notable for spendthrift promises.

The Economist

This result was notable for two reasons.

The Economist

Wilmore's act was notable for other reasons.

The New Yorker

Jive Turkey was notable for its diversity.

The Guardian - Music

The race was notable for several factors.

The New York Times

The win was notable for two reasons.

The New York Times - Sports

He was notable for the boisterous "Jerry!

The Guardian - TV & Radio

That sequence was notable for another reason.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Rory McIlroy's appearance once was notable for … well, very little.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was notable for", ensure that the reason for noteworthiness is clearly and directly stated immediately after the phrase. This enhances clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid relying excessively on passive constructions with "was notable for". Use active voice to make your writing more dynamic and engaging. For example, instead of "The research was notable for its findings", try "The research's findings made it notable".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was notable for" functions as a descriptive phrase, used to emphasize a particular quality or characteristic that made something stand out or worthy of attention. As evidenced by Ludwig, the phrase is employed to highlight specific aspects across a range of topics.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

13%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Academia

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was notable for" serves to highlight significant aspects or qualities of a subject, making it a valuable tool for emphasizing key details. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable across a wide range of contexts. Its prevalence in news, science, and encyclopedic sources underscores its utility in formal and informative writing. When employing "was notable for", ensure that the subsequent details are clear and specific, allowing the reader to grasp the essence of what made the subject stand out. While useful, consider using stronger, more descriptive alternatives to add nuance and avoid overuse of the passive voice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was significant for

Emphasizes the importance or consequence of something.

was remarkable for

Highlights something exceptional or extraordinary.

was important for

Indicates the high value or crucial role of something.

was distinguished by

Focuses on the unique qualities that set something apart.

was characterized by

Describes the main attributes or features of something.

was known for

Indicates widespread recognition or fame for a particular trait.

was defined by

Suggests that something's essence or identity is determined by certain aspects.

was outstanding for

Highlights something's superior quality or performance.

was prominent for

Emphasizes the obvious or easily noticeable qualities of something.

was celebrated for

Indicates that something is publicly praised or admired.

FAQs

How can I use "was notable for" in a sentence?

The phrase "was notable for" is used to highlight a specific quality or aspect that made something stand out. For example, "The film "was notable for" its innovative special effects".

What are some alternatives to "was notable for"?

You can use alternatives like "was significant for", "was remarkable for", or "was important for" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was notable for" or "is notable for"?

Use "was notable for" when referring to something in the past. Use "is notable for" when referring to something currently known or recognized. For example, "The battle "was notable for" its strategic importance" (past), and "The artist "is notable for" her unique style" (present).

What's the difference between "was notable for" and "was known for"?

"Was notable for" highlights a specific aspect that made something stand out, while "was known for" indicates a widespread recognition or reputation. For example, "The experiment "was notable for" its groundbreaking methodology", while "The scientist "was known for" his contributions to the field".