was recognized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognized with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used when someone is being rewarded or acknowledged for a special achievement. Example sentence: His service to the community was recognized with a prestigious award.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

He also was recognized with another widely used if unofficial designation, Mr. Aviation Safety.

The New York Times

Mrs. Callner Miller's dedication was recognized with an honorary fellowship from the Technion in 1984.

The New York Times

At the agency's annual meeting several months ago, Andy was recognized with the Founder's Award.

The New York Times

Her work was recognized with photography awards and a 1955 George Polk Award, among others.

The New York Times

Mr. Coler, who developed some of California's largest hotels, was recognized with a Technion honorary fellowship.

The New York Times

A true American tenor, his superb voice was recognized with a Richard Tucker Career Grant.

The New York Times

Marcus Gardley was recognized with the PEN/Laura Pels Foundation Award for a mid-career dramatist.

The New Yorker

Also that year Saralegui was recognized with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The restoration was recognized with a heritage award from the government of Gibraltar in 2011.

The New York Times

In 1967 Oppenheim was recognized with a large retrospective in Stockholm.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In June that performance was recognized with a Tony nomination, an honor she described as "a hoot".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was recognized with", ensure that the 'with' preposition is followed by the specific award, honor, or item received as a result of the recognition. For example, "She was recognized with the Nobel Prize".

Common error

Avoid using "was recognized for" when "was recognized with" is more appropriate. "For" is generally used to describe the reason for recognition, while "with" denotes what was received. For example, use "She was recognized for her contributions" but "She was recognized with an award."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognized with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject received an award, honor, or some form of recognition. It highlights the act of bestowing recognition upon someone or something. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was recognized with" is a versatile and frequently used phrase to describe the act of receiving an award, honor, or acknowledgment. Ludwig AI validates that the phrase is grammatically sound and common in various contexts. It is most often found in news and media, scientific publications, and encyclopedias. To use it effectively, ensure that "with" is followed by the specific award or honor received and consider alternative phrases like "was honored with" or "was awarded" to add nuance. Remember to use "was recognized for" when describing the reason for recognition rather than the award itself. By following these guidelines, you can confidently use "was recognized with" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was honored with

Replaces "recognized" with a synonym that emphasizes respect and high esteem.

was awarded

Focuses on the act of giving a formal prize or distinction.

was presented with

Highlights the act of formally giving something to someone.

was acknowledged for

Similar to recognized, but can also imply a more informal type of recognition.

received

A more general term indicating the act of getting something, in this case, recognition.

was lauded for

Emphasizes praise and admiration for someone's achievements.

was given

A simple and direct way of stating that someone received something.

was distinguished by

Highlights the unique qualities that led to someone's recognition.

was celebrated with

Implies a joyful acknowledgment of someone's achievements.

was accredited with

Specifically used when someone is officially recognized for meeting certain standards.

FAQs

How is "was recognized with" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was recognized with" indicates that someone received an award, honor, or other form of acknowledgment. For example, "The scientist "was recognized with" a prestigious award for her research."

What are some alternatives to "was recognized with"?

Alternatives include "was honored with", "was awarded", or "received" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was recognized for" instead of "was recognized with"?

The correct preposition depends on the context. Use "was recognized for" to indicate the reason for recognition (e.g., "She was recognized for her bravery"). Use "was recognized with" to indicate the award or honor received (e.g., "She "was recognized with" a medal").

What's the difference between "was recognized with" and "was acknowledged for"?

"Was recognized with" typically refers to receiving a tangible reward or honor. "Was acknowledged for" implies a more general acknowledgment of one's contributions or qualities. You can say "He was acknowledged for his hard work" but "He "was recognized with" an employee of the month award".