Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was honored with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was honored with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing someone receiving an award, recognition, or distinction for their achievements or contributions. Example: "She was honored with the prestigious award for her outstanding contributions to the community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mugabe was honored with seven birthday cakes.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He was honored with a French knighthood.

News & Media

The New York Times

Faust was honored with the Radcliffe Medal.

In 1909, he was honored with a knighthood.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Last night, he was honored with the Palermo award.

He was honored with the Shorenstein Journalism Award in 2005.

In addition, Goldberg was honored with a postage stamp.

He was honored with numerous awards recognizing decades of service and leadership.

News & Media

The New York Times

Dr. Berson died in 1972, before Dr. Yalow was honored with the Nobel.

News & Media

The New York Times

On Nov. 17, she was honored with the Gay Men's Health Crisis inaugural Style Vault award.

News & Media

The New York Times

Trudie Styler, who was honored with her husband, Sting, spoke eloquently to us about conservation issues.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's accomplishments, combine "was honored with" with details about the achievement to provide context and highlight the value of the recognition.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice. While "was honored with" is grammatically correct, excessively passive constructions can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate for a more direct style.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was honored with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received an honor or award. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Academia

22%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Science

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was honored with" is a versatile and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that someone received recognition or an award. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its usage is widespread across various contexts, particularly in news media and academic publications. When employing this phrase, ensure that the prestige and significance of the honor are conveyed effectively, and remember to avoid overuse of passive voice for a more impactful writing style. Alternatives such as "received an award" and "was presented with" can be used for variety, depending on the desired nuance.

FAQs

How can I use "was honored with" in a sentence?

Use "was honored with" to indicate that someone received an award, title, or special recognition. For example, "The scientist "was honored with" a Nobel Prize for her groundbreaking research".

What are some alternatives to "was honored with"?

Alternatives include "received an award", "was presented with", or "was given an accolade". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "is honored by" instead of "was honored with"?

While "is honored by" is grammatically correct, it has a slightly different meaning. "Is honored by" typically refers to the source or organization bestowing the honor, whereas "was honored with" focuses on the recipient and what they received.

What's the difference between "was honored with" and "was awarded"?

"Was awarded" is a more direct and general term for receiving something, while "was honored with" implies that the award carries significant prestige or respect. For example, you might be awarded a certificate, but "was honored with" a medal.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: