was recognised with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognised with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone received an award or acknowledgment for their achievements or contributions. Example: "She was recognised with the prestigious award for her outstanding contributions to the field of science."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

This was recognised with the presentation of the Nebula Grand Master Award in 1994.

The Guardian

The work was recognised with a Pulitzer prize in April 2014.

The Guardian

In 2006 it was recognised with the silver award in the news and current affairs category.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Rambaldi's work on these two blockbusters was recognised with Academy Awards (shared) for visual effects.

The Guardian - Film

In 1985 he was recognised with the Pritzker Prize, one of architecture's most prestigious awards.

Independent

With its distinctive circular shape, it was recognised with Grade II* listing.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

Volunteers are recognised with a sign along the road they adopt.

The Guardian

Cluster analysis demonstrates that pain and emotion are recognised with a high degree of specificity.

PAIN®

Smith said: "I'm sincerely thankful and humbled to be recognised with such an honour.

The Guardian

It's good that he is to be recognised with a Commons unveiling.

The Guardian - Opinion

Matthew Pinsent, Britain's other Olympic hero, is recognised with a knighthood.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was recognised with" when you want to emphasize that an achievement or contribution led to a specific honor, award, or form of public acknowledgement. Ensure the context clearly states both the action and the resulting recognition.

Common error

Avoid using "was recognised with" in contexts where the active voice would be clearer and more direct. For instance, instead of "The author was recognised with an award by the committee", consider "The committee recognised the author with an award."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognised with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject received some form of formal acknowledgement, honor, or award. According to Ludwig AI, this is a valid and commonly used expression. Examples show it used across various contexts, from academic achievements to cultural contributions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

51%

Wiki

21%

Science

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was recognised with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that denotes the reception of acknowledgment, awards, or honors. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability across various contexts. Predominantly found in News & Media and Wiki sources, its purpose is to highlight achievements and contributions. When writing, consider using it to emphasize the positive outcome of receiving recognition. For alternative expressions, consider "was awarded" or "was honored with", depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was awarded

Focuses specifically on the act of granting an award.

was honored with

Emphasizes the honor and prestige associated with the recognition.

received recognition for

Highlights the act of receiving acknowledgment.

was presented with

Focuses on the act of receiving something formally.

was celebrated with

Emphasizes the celebratory aspect of the recognition.

gained acknowledgement for

Highlights effort and achievement leading to recognition.

was distinguished by

Focuses on the characteristics that made the recipient stand out.

was credited with

Highlights the attribution of a positive outcome or achievement.

was attributed to

Focuses on the cause or origin of the recognition.

was marked by

Indicates that the event or achievement was notable or significant.

FAQs

How can I use "was recognised with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was recognised with" indicates that someone or something received acknowledgment for their achievements. For example, "Her dedication to the project "was recognised with" an award".

What are some alternatives to "was recognised with"?

Alternatives include "was awarded", "was honored with", or "received recognition for", depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "was recognised with" and "was awarded"?

"Was awarded" specifically refers to receiving an award, while "was recognised with" is a broader term that can include any form of acknowledgment, not just formal awards. Therefore, while both are correct, was awarded is more precise when an actual award is given.

When is it more appropriate to use "was recognised with" instead of "received recognition for"?

"Was recognised with" is often used when specifying a particular honor or prize received, while "received recognition for" is more general and can refer to acknowledgment without a specific award. For instance, “The company received recognition for its innovative product design” versus “The company "was recognised with" the Innovation Award for its product design”.