was recognised from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognised from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone or something was identified or acknowledged based on a specific source or reference. Example: "The painting was recognised from the famous art exhibition held last year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The pavilion's curator, David Beevers, says the priceless wartime propaganda value of the newly opened "royal" hospital, and the meticulous provision for Hindu, Sikh and Muslim patients, was recognised from the start.

The Guardian

Immaturity of T cells after allogeneic BMT was recognised from the low output of interferon- γ (IFN- γ), which was however somewhat elevated following DC immunisation.

British Journal of Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

He is recognised from Morocco's souks to the beaches of Ko Samui.

The Guardian - Travel

The value of low-level help and support is recognised, from sitting services, through befriending, shopping and pet care.

The Guardian

I'm sure my daughter could have had a completely different life if her right to be included had been recognised from the start".

The Guardian

More teeth have since been found in Denmark, and now England, so more examples seem likely to turn up – or be recognised from previous excavations.

The Guardian

It is not at all clear that this will come to be recognised from within, and the core issue of self-interest will always discourage member associations from handing power to an outside body, even temporarily.

The Guardian - Sport

Police believe it is as likely that the fugitives will be recognised from a social networking site or chatroom, such as Facebook or Twitter, as spotted walking down the street.

Independent

Different distances are recognised, from "sprint" (750m swim/20km cycle/5km run) to "ultra" (3.9km/180km/26.2 miles - yes, that's a full marathon on the end), but the most common - and the one competed in the Olympics - is that outlined above.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It can be recognised from the glow of a smartphone screen, where the low heat output and slim size of LEDs are a selling point, or from the backlight of a newer LED TV, where the low power usage lets manufacturers trumpet cheaper electricity bills.

The Guardian

So Nynex, hardly the most popular local telephone company in America, knew it was in for a scrap when it recently unveiled a plan to deprive some Manhattanites of their treasured 212 area code--arguably the only local telephone code that is recognised from Tokyo to Tomsk.The problem is that New York is running out of telephone numbers.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was recognised from", ensure that the source from which the recognition occurred is clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was recognised from" without specifying the source or basis of recognition. This can leave the reader wondering how the recognition was achieved or what it was based on.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognised from" functions as a passive construction indicating the act of identification or acknowledgement based on a specific source. The phrase is used to show that something or someone was identified because of a particular feature, place, or origin, as evidenced by Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

45%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was recognised from" is a phrase used to indicate that something or someone was identified or acknowledged based on a specific source or reference. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and usable in written English. It appears most commonly in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, it's best practice to clearly state the source of recognition to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include phrases like "was identified by" or "was distinguished from", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was identified by

Focuses on the act of pinpointing or distinguishing something based on specific information; emphasizes the identification process.

was distinguished from

Highlights the act of differentiating something from others, emphasizing its unique characteristics based on some source.

was ascertained through

Stresses the process of discovering something with certainty through a particular method or source.

was determined by

Emphasizes the reliance on a particular source or factor in establishing something.

was known through

Highlights how awareness or knowledge of something was gained via a particular means or source.

was detected from

Focuses on the act of noticing or discovering something, especially when it is not immediately obvious, based on a specific source.

was discerned from

Emphasizes the act of perceiving or understanding something subtle based on particular evidence.

was understood based on

Stresses the comprehension of something in light of specific knowledge or information.

was acknowledged due to

Highlights that something gained acceptance or recognition because of a specific factor or source.

was attributed to

Focuses on ascribing a quality or characteristic to someone or something based on a particular source or reason.

FAQs

How can I use "was recognised from" in a sentence?

Use "was recognised from" to indicate that someone or something was identified or acknowledged based on a specific source or reference. For example, "The melody "was recognised from" a popular song from the 1980s".

What are some alternatives to "was recognised from"?

Alternatives include "was identified by", "was distinguished from", or "was determined by", depending on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was recognised from"?

The choice between active and passive voice depends on the focus of the sentence. If the emphasis is on the source doing the recognizing, use the active voice. If the emphasis is on what was recognised, the passive voice with "was recognised from" is appropriate.

What's the difference between "was recognised from" and "was recognised by"?

"Was recognised from" specifies the source or basis of recognition, while "was recognised by" indicates the entity that performed the recognition. For example, "The painting "was recognised from" its unique brushstrokes," versus "The painting "was recognised by" the art expert".