Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was recognised by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something received acknowledgment or validation from a specific person or group. Example: "The artist was recognised by the local community for her contributions to public art."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

His contribution was recognised by a state funeral in Nigeria.

The highly autonomous RS was recognised by the peace settlement.

News & Media

The Guardian

The problem was recognised by Nasheed when in office.

News & Media

The Guardian

His academic standing was recognised by his election to the British Academy in 1967.

News & Media

The Guardian

His intellect was recognised by Charnley himself, who came to Exeter to observe surgery.

News & Media

The Guardian

He showed a professionalism in the cutthroat world of journalism that was recognised by everyone.

News & Media

The Guardian

The downgrading by Wilson was recognised by other providers, and apparently admitted by Wilson.

News & Media

The Guardian

Rob says: She was recognised by so many people on the lake.

News & Media

The Guardian

Her talent was recognised by the IPC, which this year awarded her the wildcard.

It was recognised by the trial judge and the court of appeal.

News & Media

The Guardian

He was recognised by cricket followers around the world more by his voice than his appearance.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was recognised by" to highlight the source or authority that acknowledged the subject, adding credibility to the statement. For instance, "The research was recognised by the National Science Foundation."

Common error

Avoid using "was recognised by" when the recognition is self-proclaimed or lacks external validation. Ensure the source of recognition is credible and clearly stated.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognised by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject received acknowledgment, approval, or validation from a specific source. Ludwig's examples show its prevalent use across diverse contexts, confirming its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was recognised by" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction that highlights acknowledgment or validation from a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its usage across diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and business. When writing, ensure the source of recognition is credible and clearly stated, and that the recognition is not self-proclaimed. Consider alternatives like "was acknowledged by" or "was honored by" for different nuances. By using "was recognised by" effectively, you can add credibility and significance to your statements.

FAQs

How can I use "was recognised by" in a sentence?

Use "was recognised by" to indicate that someone or something received acknowledgment, approval, or validation from a specific entity. For example, "The project "was recognised by" the United Nations for its sustainability efforts."

What are some alternatives to "was recognised by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was acknowledged by", "was identified by", or "was honored by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was recognised from" instead of "was recognised by"?

No, "was recognised from" implies identification based on origin or characteristics, while ""was recognised by"" indicates acknowledgment or validation from an external source.

What's the difference between "was recognised by" and "became recognised by"?

"Was recognised by" indicates a point-in-time acknowledgment, whereas "became recognised by" suggests a gradual process of gaining recognition.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: