was acknowledged by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was acknowledged by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something received recognition or validation from another party. Example: "The research findings were acknowledged by several leading experts in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

This point was acknowledged by Wang.

The Guardian

A negative club culture was acknowledged by the committee".

The Guardian

This was acknowledged by Khrushchev after his retirement.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Its victory was acknowledged by the Bosnian coach, Safet Susic.

The New York Times - Sports

His participation was acknowledged by Hamas last month.

The Guardian

A subsequent NYPD "slowdown" was acknowledged by Bratton.

The Guardian

That view was acknowledged by some workers, union officials and even the town's mayor, Raffaele Russo.

The New York Times

His ability was acknowledged by the most successful British manager of all time.

The Guardian - Sport

This point was acknowledged by Alastair Miller, the finance director, when he revealed disappointing Christmas results.

The Guardian - Business

That attack took place in 2008 and was acknowledged by the Pentagon only this August.

The Guardian - Tech

This role was acknowledged by Sir Mark Walport in his assessment of the Internet of Things.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was acknowledged by" to clearly indicate the source of recognition or validation for a statement, fact, or accomplishment. This strengthens credibility.

Common error

Ensure that the source you attribute acknowledgment to is actually the one that provided it. Misattributing can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was acknowledged by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject received recognition or validation from a specified source. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

43%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was acknowledged by" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to indicate that something has been recognized or validated by a particular source. Ludwig AI confirms that it is widely employed across various contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Wiki sources. While often found in neutral to formal registers, it effectively highlights credibility and acceptance. When using the phrase, ensure accurate attribution and consider alternatives like "was recognized by" or "was accepted by" for nuances in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was recognized by

Uses "recognized" instead of "acknowledged", suggesting a more formal or public recognition.

was accepted by

Emphasizes acceptance or agreement rather than simple acknowledgment.

was confirmed by

Suggests that something was verified or proven by someone or something.

was validated by

Highlights that something was proven and conformed.

was ratified by

Implies formal approval or endorsement.

was endorsed by

Indicates support or approval, often from a person or organization of authority.

was admitted by

Suggests that someone conceded or confessed something.

was conceded by

Similar to "admitted by", but may imply a more reluctant agreement.

was attested to by

Highlights that something was supported by evidence or testimony.

was borne out by

Emphasizes that something was proven true over time or by subsequent events.

FAQs

How can I use "was acknowledged by" in a sentence?

Use "was acknowledged by" to show that something has been recognized or accepted by a particular person or group. For example, "The discovery "was acknowledged by" leading scientists in the field."

What's a more formal alternative to "was acknowledged by"?

More formal alternatives include phrases like "was recognized by", "was ratified by", or "was endorsed by", depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to include "by" after "was acknowledged"?

Yes, the preposition "by" is essential to indicate who or what is doing the acknowledging. Without it, the sentence is grammatically incomplete and the meaning unclear.

What is the difference between "was acknowledged by" and "was accepted by"?

"Was acknowledged by" implies recognition of a fact or statement, while "was accepted by" suggests agreement or approval. The former is about recognizing something as true, the latter is about agreeing with it.