was received at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was received at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the time or place where something was received, often in formal or official contexts. Example: "The package was received at the main office on Monday morning."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"That was received at headquarters.

The New York Times

MacArthur's removal was received at the front.

The New Yorker

Khai was received at the White House by Pres.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was received at the Élysée Palace by Georges Pompidou, then the French president.

The New York Times

But Mr. McCain's message, to the extent it was received at all, irritated them.

The New York Times

In a little time the result was received at the telegraph office.

The Economist

The tip was received at a Crime Stoppers phone line in July.

The New York Times

He visited the library's director, Edwin Hatfield Anderson, to ensure that "Lady Nicotine was received at court".

The New Yorker

An automated message was received at 3.14am indicating a failure of the electrical system, Air France said in a statement.

The Guardian

He made a recommendation that we initiate a program to look at flight schools that was received at headquarters.

The New York Times

Update: In response to a phone call, Tim Jones emailed a statement, which was received at 1.20pm.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was received at", ensure clarity by specifying both the entity that received something and the location or time of reception.

Common error

Avoid using "was received at" without clearly stating who or what received the item or information. For instance, instead of saying "The information was received at the office", specify who received it: "The information was received by the manager at the office."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was received at" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something was taken in or accepted at a particular place or by a specific entity. Ludwig provides numerous examples across various contexts demonstrating its use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was received at" is a versatile phrase used to denote the place or entity where something was received. Ludwig AI analysis and examples confirm its grammatical correctness and its frequent appearance across diverse sources such as News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. The analysis shows that the phrase is considered correct and very common. To ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing, clearly specify both the recipient and the location. Common errors include omitting the receiver, which can lead to ambiguity. Remember, the phrase is suitable for neutral to professional contexts. Consider alternatives like "was delivered to" or "arrived at" for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was delivered to

Focuses on the act of delivering something to a specific location, emphasizing the transportation aspect.

was accepted at

Highlights the act of acceptance rather than just the arrival, implying a positive reception.

arrived at

Simply indicates the arrival of something, without specifying who received it.

was obtained from

Emphasizes the source from where something was acquired rather than the place of reception.

was registered with

Implies a formal recording or registration process at a particular place.

was logged at

Focuses on the act of recording an event or item at a specific location or time.

was documented in

Emphasizes the recording of something within a particular document or system located somewhere.

was processed through

Highlights the processing of something at a specific point or system.

was channelled into

Indicates the direction or movement of something towards a specific location or entity.

was directed towards

Focuses on the intended destination or recipient of something.

FAQs

How can I use "was received at" in a sentence?

You can use "was received at" to indicate the location or entity that received something. For example, "The package "was received at" the front desk" or "The message "was received at" headquarters".

What are some alternatives to "was received at"?

Alternatives include "was delivered to", "was accepted at", or simply "arrived at", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "was received by" instead of "was received at"?

Yes, "was received by" is also correct and focuses on the receiver. "The award "was received by" the actress". While "was received at" emphasizes the location: "The award "was received at" the ceremony".

What is the difference between "was received at" and "was obtained from"?

"Was received at" indicates where something ended up, while "was obtained from" specifies the source. For example, "The information "was received at" the station", while "The information "was obtained from" a confidential source".