was obtained from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was obtained from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an item or information that was obtained from a certain source. Example sentence: The information for this research project was obtained from various online sources.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Cisplatin was obtained from Pfizer.

Nature

Birthweight was obtained from medical records.

Duke University

The above information was obtained from.

Wikipedia

TrypLExpress was obtained from Invitrogen.

Plosone

Quercetin was obtained from Extrasynthese.

Plosone

Tunicamycin was obtained from Sigma.

Plosone

Camptothecin was obtained from Calbiochem.

Plosone

LPS was obtained from Sigma.

Plosone

BIO was obtained from Calbiochem.

Plosone

Ovalbumin (OVA) was obtained from Sigma.

Plosone

SHIVKu1 was obtained from NIH (www.aidsreagent.org).org

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating the origin of data or materials in academic or scientific writing, use "was obtained from" to clearly and directly identify your source.

Common error

Avoid using "was obtained from" in casual conversation or informal writing where simpler alternatives like "came from" or "got from" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was obtained from" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate the source or origin of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

90%

Academia

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

News & Media

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was obtained from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that effectively denotes the source or origin of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is acceptable in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it maintains a formal tone. While simpler alternatives exist for informal use, "was obtained from" provides clarity and precision in formal writing. The examples demonstrate that the sources often include scientific publications and academic papers, highlighting its relevance in research and scholarly communication. It's important to cite properly and ensure accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was acquired from

Emphasizes the process of gaining possession or access, differing slightly in focus from simply obtaining.

was sourced from

Highlights the origin or supplier of a material or resource, often used in a business or supply chain context.

was derived from

Implies a process of extraction or development from an original source, suggesting a transformation.

originated from

Focuses on the starting point or initial creation of something, rather than the act of obtaining it.

came from

A more informal and general way to indicate the source or origin of something.

was received from

Highlights the act of being given something, emphasizing the transfer from one entity to another.

was taken from

Suggests a more direct or forceful action of acquiring something, sometimes implying a lack of permission.

was collected from

Highlights a systematic gathering of data or items from a specific location or group.

was extracted from

Focuses on the process of removing something from a larger substance or source.

was furnished by

Indicates that someone provided or supplied something, often used in a formal or legal context.

FAQs

What is a more casual way to say "was obtained from"?

In informal contexts, you can use phrases like "came from" or "got from" as alternatives to "was obtained from".

How can I use "was obtained from" in a sentence?

Use "was obtained from" to indicate the source of something. For example, "The data for the study was obtained from the national registry."

What's the difference between "was obtained from" and "was derived from"?

"Was obtained from" simply indicates the source, while "was derived from" suggests that something was developed or extracted from the original source.

Is it always necessary to specify where information "was obtained from"?

In academic and professional writing, it's crucial to cite your sources to give credit and avoid plagiarism. In less formal contexts, it may not always be necessary.