Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was quantified with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was quantified with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you need to explain the process used to measure something. For example: The amount of ice cream consumed was quantified with a survey.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Grip force was quantified with a dynamometer.

COP regularity was quantified with sample entropy.

Relative optical density was quantified with ImageJ Software.

Science & Research

Nature

The signal was quantified with the ImageJ software.

Science & Research

Nature

Cell-free area was quantified with ImageJ software.

Science & Research

Nature

NP activity was quantified with 15 min time bins.

Science & Research

Nature

Purified RNA was quantified with Qubit RNA HS Assay.

Science & Research

Nature

Immunofluorescence was quantified with a specially designed Olympus macro, DetectIntZ.

Brain perfusion was quantified with pseudo continuous ASL.

Temporal scaling was quantified with detrended fluctuation analysis.

The physical behavior was quantified with equivalent circuit.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was quantified with", ensure that the method or tool used for quantification is clearly specified to provide context and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was quantified with" without specifying the measurement tool or method. For example, instead of writing 'The data was quantified with software', specify 'The data was quantified with ImageJ software'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was quantified with" functions as part of a passive construction, indicating that a measurement or calculation was performed using a specific method or tool. Ludwig AI shows its frequent use in scientific literature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

Science & Research

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was quantified with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used construction, particularly within scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent usage. It serves to clearly articulate the method or tool employed to derive a numerical value. When using the phrase, clarity is key: specify the method to ensure your writing is precise and credible. While alternatives like "was measured using" or "was assessed via" exist, "was quantified with" is particularly suited for contexts emphasizing numerical results obtained through a specific process.

FAQs

How can I use "was quantified with" in a sentence?

Use "was quantified with" to indicate the method or tool used to measure something. For example, "Cell-free area "was quantified with ImageJ software"".

What are some alternatives to saying "was quantified with"?

You can use phrases like "was measured using", "was assessed via", or "was evaluated through" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing quantification methods?

While active voice can be more direct, passive voice (e.g., "was quantified with") is often preferred in scientific writing to emphasize the method rather than the actor.

What's the difference between "was quantified with" and "was analyzed with"?

"Was quantified with" implies a numerical measurement, while "was analyzed with" suggests a more in-depth examination of the data or results. Choose the phrase that best reflects the process you are describing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: