Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was quantified with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'was quantified with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you need to explain the process used to measure something. For example: The amount of ice cream consumed was quantified with a survey.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Science & Research
Academia
Alternative expressions(20)
was measured using
was assessed via
was evaluated through
was analyzed with
was determined by means of
was analyzed using
was estimated with
was operationalized with
was evaluated with
was identified with
was assessed with
was measured with
was adjudicated with
was specified with
was assigned with
was determined with
was calculated with
was ascertained with
was clarified with
was defined with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Grip force was quantified with a dynamometer.
Science
COP regularity was quantified with sample entropy.
Science
Relative optical density was quantified with ImageJ Software.
Science & Research
The signal was quantified with the ImageJ software.
Science & Research
Cell-free area was quantified with ImageJ software.
Science & Research
NP activity was quantified with 15 min time bins.
Science & Research
Purified RNA was quantified with Qubit RNA HS Assay.
Science & Research
Immunofluorescence was quantified with a specially designed Olympus macro, DetectIntZ.
Brain perfusion was quantified with pseudo continuous ASL.
Science
Temporal scaling was quantified with detrended fluctuation analysis.
The physical behavior was quantified with equivalent circuit.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was quantified with", ensure that the method or tool used for quantification is clearly specified to provide context and credibility.
Common error
Avoid using "was quantified with" without specifying the measurement tool or method. For example, instead of writing 'The data was quantified with software', specify 'The data was quantified with ImageJ software'.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was quantified with" functions as part of a passive construction, indicating that a measurement or calculation was performed using a specific method or tool. Ludwig AI shows its frequent use in scientific literature.
Frequent in
Science
55%
Science & Research
35%
Academia
10%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was quantified with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used construction, particularly within scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent usage. It serves to clearly articulate the method or tool employed to derive a numerical value. When using the phrase, clarity is key: specify the method to ensure your writing is precise and credible. While alternatives like "was measured using" or "was assessed via" exist, "was quantified with" is particularly suited for contexts emphasizing numerical results obtained through a specific process.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was measured using
Replaces "quantified" with the more general term "measured" focusing on the action of measuring rather than the numerical aspect.
was assessed via
Substitutes "quantified" with "assessed" and "with" with "via", shifting the focus to a broader evaluation through a method.
was evaluated through
Similar to "assessed via", this emphasizes the evaluation process using a specific method.
was determined by means of
Uses a more formal and detailed construction, replacing "quantified" with "determined" and "with" with "by means of" to emphasize the method.
was analyzed using
Shifts the focus to analysis, implying a more in-depth examination rather than a simple quantification.
was calculated employing
Focuses on the calculation aspect and replaces "with" with "employing", making it suitable for mathematical contexts.
was gauged by
Replaces "quantified" with "gauged", implying an approximate or estimated measurement.
was indexed against
Implies a comparison to a standard or index, suitable for contexts where relative measurements are used.
was rated on
Replaces "quantified" with "rated", indicating a subjective or qualitative assessment on a defined scale.
was approximated with
Suggests an estimation rather than a precise measurement, useful when the exact value is not known or necessary.
FAQs
How can I use "was quantified with" in a sentence?
Use "was quantified with" to indicate the method or tool used to measure something. For example, "Cell-free area "was quantified with ImageJ software"".
What are some alternatives to saying "was quantified with"?
You can use phrases like "was measured using", "was assessed via", or "was evaluated through" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing quantification methods?
While active voice can be more direct, passive voice (e.g., "was quantified with") is often preferred in scientific writing to emphasize the method rather than the actor.
What's the difference between "was quantified with" and "was analyzed with"?
"Was quantified with" implies a numerical measurement, while "was analyzed with" suggests a more in-depth examination of the data or results. Choose the phrase that best reflects the process you are describing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested