Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was measured using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'was measured using' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that someone or something was measured by means of a certain method or tool. For example: "The size of the room was measured using a measuring tape."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Pain was measured using two standardized pain questionnaires.
News & Media
Brain activity was measured using Quantative EEGs.
News & Media
PEEPi was measured using the Pmus curve.
Luminescence was measured using the Safire2 reader.
Science
Witnessing was measured using seven items.
Slope was measured using a clinometer.
Cardiac index was measured using echocardiography.
Science
DO was measured using Winkler's method.
Science
The PAPR was measured using Equation 11.
ΔΨ was measured using JC-1 probe.
Science
The HR was measured using a stethoscope.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a measurement, be specific about the instrument or method used. For example, instead of just saying "Temperature was measured", specify "Temperature was measured using a thermometer."
Common error
Ensure you clearly state what "was measured using" what. Ambiguity can arise if the subject being measured or the instrument used isn't clearly defined. For example, don't write "Performance was measured using the system" but rather "System performance was measured using benchmark tests."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was measured using" functions as a passive construction indicating the method or instrument employed to quantify a specific attribute or variable. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase. Examples from Ludwig show it frequently introducing the specific tool or technique for measurement.
Frequent in
Science
85%
News & Media
10%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was measured using" serves to specify the instrument or method used in a quantification process, and is grammatically correct as indicated by Ludwig AI. It appears most frequently in scientific and academic contexts, providing transparency and aiding reproducibility. Alternative phrases like "was determined via" or "was assessed through" offer subtle shifts in emphasis. Remember to be specific about both the subject and method of measurement for maximum clarity. High-authority sources like PlosOne and The New York Times frequently use this phrase, confirming its widespread acceptance. Ludwig’s examples show that the phrase is a common and accepted way to introduce the tool that was used for the measurement.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was determined via
This alternative emphasizes the process of finding something out using a specific method, differing slightly from the more general measurement.
was assessed through
This suggests an evaluation or judgment was made using a particular tool or technique, implying a more subjective approach than a precise measurement.
was quantified by means of
This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the use of a specific tool or method for numerical assessment.
was evaluated with
This suggests a broader evaluation or appraisal, not necessarily limited to precise measurement but involving judgment and interpretation.
was gauged by
This suggests an approximate assessment or estimation, often implying a less precise measurement than the original phrase.
was analyzed utilizing
This focuses on the analytical process involved in assessing something, rather than just the act of measuring.
was checked using
This suggests a verification process, where something is examined to ensure it meets a certain standard.
was tested via
This implies that a procedure was carried out to determine specific characteristics or qualities.
was calculated from
This suggests that the measurement was derived indirectly through calculations based on other data.
was derived from
This implies that the value or result was obtained or inferred from a source, not necessarily measured directly.
FAQs
How do I use "was measured using" in a sentence?
Use "was measured using" to describe the method or tool used to quantify something. For example, "The distance was measured using a laser rangefinder".
What can I say instead of "was measured using"?
You can use alternatives like "was determined via", "was assessed through", or "was quantified by means of" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "was measured by" or "was measured using"?
"Was measured using" specifies the instrument or method, while "was measured by" is more general and can refer to an entity or process. Using "was measured using" often provides greater clarity, though using "was measured by" may be appropriate depending on the sentence structure.
What's the difference between "was evaluated using" and "was measured using"?
"Was measured using" implies a quantitative assessment, while "was evaluated using" suggests a broader, potentially qualitative assessment. Measurement focuses on precise quantification, while evaluation considers a range of factors.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested