was analyzed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was analyzed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or tools used to analyze data or information in a study or report. Example: "The data was analyzed with statistical software to determine the significance of the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

TOC was analyzed with TOC Analyzer (Tekmar Dohrmann Apollo 9000).

Applied Water Science

Data was analyzed with SPSS v19.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Mortality was analyzed with Kaplan Meier method.

Annals of Intensive Care

Only EPFL-PoliMI was analyzed with MOVIE.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

was analyzed with gel permeation chromatography (GPC).

Nanoscale Research Letters

Data was analyzed with a profile analysis.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

The proximal tibia was analyzed with microCT.

Experimental Gerontology

Data was analyzed with distribution percent-frequency.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Data analysis: Data was analyzed with SPSS 15.0.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Survival was analyzed with the log-rank Mantel-Cox test.

EJNMMI Research

Crystallinity of HFNDs was analyzed with XRD (X'pert PRO).

Nanoscale Research Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was analyzed with", ensure that the tool or method specified is accurate and relevant to the context. Be specific about the analysis method to provide clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was analyzed with" without specifying the tool or method. For example, instead of saying "the data was analyzed with software", specify "the data was analyzed with SPSS version 20" to provide more precise information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was analyzed with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject underwent a process of examination using a specific method or tool. As Ludwig AI suggests, this structure is common for detailing analytical methodologies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was analyzed with" is a grammatically correct passive construction widely used to describe the methods employed in an analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's particularly prevalent in scientific and academic writing for its objective and informative nature. When using this phrase, ensure the tool or method is clearly specified to maintain clarity and credibility. Remember that alternatives like "was examined using" or "was assessed via" can offer nuanced ways to express similar meanings, depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was examined using

This alternative emphasizes the process of examination rather than a specific analysis.

was assessed via

This alternative suggests a formal or structured evaluation process.

was evaluated through

Similar to 'assessed via', it highlights the method of evaluation.

was investigated by means of

This phrase indicates a more in-depth or research-oriented approach.

was determined by

This option suggests the method led to a specific conclusion or finding.

was checked via

This implies a verification process using a particular tool or method.

was measured utilizing

This alternative focuses on the act of measurement with a specific instrument.

was probed with

This option suggests a more exploratory or investigative approach.

was tested utilizing

Implies the use of a formal test or experiment.

was processed employing

Highlights the use of a particular method or software for processing data.

FAQs

How can I use "was analyzed with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was analyzed with" is used to describe the tools or methods applied during an analysis. For example: "The sample was analyzed with gas chromatography."

What's a good alternative to "was analyzed with"?

You could use phrases like "was examined using", "was assessed via", or "was evaluated through" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing analysis methods?

Using the passive voice with "was analyzed with" is common in scientific writing to focus on the object of the analysis rather than the actor. Active voice might be preferred in other contexts for directness.

What does "was analyzed with" imply about the analysis process?

The phrase implies a structured and methodical examination of something, often involving specific tools or techniques. It suggests that a systematic approach was used to understand the object of analysis.