was proofread

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was proofread' is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in the passive voice to indicate that something has been reviewed and corrected for errors. For example: "The report was proofread several times before it was submitted to the client."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Instead, after the scribe's work was finished it was proofread and titles and notes were inserted.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was also a former chairman of the Amateur Astronomers Association in New York and was the author of "Insight Into Astronomy," which was also published in paperback as "A Key to the Heavens". The book was proofread by Albert Einstein, who was an accounting client of Mr. Mattersdorf for many years.

The New York Times

The manuscript was proofread and revised by all authors.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

In fact, thousands of errors were discovered; in preparing our text, it was proofread three times.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

To reduce inter-rater variance, the final segmentation was proofread by a doctor with over 10 years experience.

EJNMMI Research

The manuscript was proofread by Medjaden Bioscience Limited.

Critical Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Sue Kreitzman, 75, Bow, London One day in 2000, I was proofreading my 27th cookbook when I picked up a coloured marker and started to doodle.

The Guardian - Arts

Within a week or so, Briggs was cataloging and writing synopses of news videos and I was proofreading patents.

Huffington Post

Within eight weeks of my meeting with Lisa, my novel had a cover and I was proofreading the galleys.

Huffington Post

Make sure it is proofread thoroughly by you or a professional proofreader and clearly states your business's objectives, goals, and finances.

WikiHow

Single mismatches at the primer terminus can be proofread efficiently.

DNA Repair

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was proofread", clearly state who or what performed the proofreading to provide context and establish credibility. For example: "The manuscript was proofread by a professional editor."

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "It was proofread" without specifying who did the proofreading. This can leave the reader wondering about the quality and expertise of the review process.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was proofread" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject (a document, manuscript, etc.) underwent the action of proofreading. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was proofread" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that a text has undergone review and correction. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is valid and usable in a variety of contexts. While common in scientific, news, and academic writing, specifying the agent who performed the proofreading enhances clarity and credibility. Remember to avoid vagueness and ensure the audience understands the quality control measures applied to the text. Alternatives like "was checked for errors" or "was reviewed for accuracy" can be used for semantic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was checked for errors

This alternative is less formal and emphasizes the action of checking rather than the professional aspect of proofreading.

was reviewed for accuracy

This alternative focuses on ensuring the correctness and validity of the content, not just the grammar and spelling.

was edited and revised

This alternative suggests a more comprehensive process than just proofreading, including improvements to clarity and style.

underwent a final review

This alternative is more formal and highlights the concluding stage of the editing process.

was scrutinized for mistakes

This alternative emphasizes a thorough and critical examination to find errors.

was examined for errors

This option is a more general term and can be applied to a wider variety of contexts and documents.

was carefully vetted

This alternative suggests a thorough process of verifying and validating the content for correctness and suitability.

had been corrected

This highlights the result of the proofreading process focusing solely on the aspect of fixing errors rather than reviewing.

was given a final polish

This alternative implies a focus on refining the text and improving its overall quality.

went through quality control

This alternative indicates a systematic process to ensure it meets certain standards and is fit for purpose.

FAQs

How is "was proofread" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was proofread" indicates that a text has undergone a review to correct errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. For example, "The final draft "was proofread" before submission".

What's a simpler way to say "was proofread"?

Instead of "was proofread", you can use phrases like "was checked for errors" or "was reviewed", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it necessary to specify who did the proofreading?

While not always required, specifying who did the proofreading can add credibility. For instance, saying "It "was proofread by a professional editor"" implies a higher level of scrutiny than simply saying "It was proofread".

What's the difference between "was proofread" and "was edited"?

"Was proofread" focuses on correcting errors, while "was edited" implies a broader review that includes improvements to style, clarity, and organization. Proofreading is usually the final step after editing.