was checked for errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was checked for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something, such as a document or a piece of work, has been reviewed to identify and correct mistakes. Example: "The final report was checked for errors before submission to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

The computational basis was checked for errors when used for solving a quantum algorithm.

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

A total of 1826 trees was checked for errors following the methods of Hurst et al. ([2007]).

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

A random sample of 15 questionnaires was checked for errors arising during scanning.

BMC Family Practice

In short, the data entry of ten percent of the paper questionnaires was checked for errors.

BMC Cancer

Information were pre coded, the data was checked for errors, and missing values had been dealt with.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

The data was checked for errors and missing values before being analyzed using STATA 11.2 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

During real-time ground contacts with the APL ground station, downlinked files are checked for errors.

Acta Astronautica

The College Board disclosed a new problem yesterday in its efforts to assess and correct mistakes in the scoring of its October SAT test: an overlooked batch of 1,600 exams that have not been checked for errors.

The New York Times

Debugging the neural networks in self-driving cars is an especially slow and tedious process, with no way of measuring how thoroughly logic within the network has been checked for errors.

Columbia University

Some deductions, however, are so long or complex that they cannot be checked for errors by human beings.

Duke University

Data from the surveys were entered into statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), and 70 randomly selected surveys were checked for errors.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was checked for errors", specify who or what conducted the check to provide context and increase clarity. For example, "The data was checked for errors by the research team."

Common error

Avoid using "was checked for errors" without indicating the type of errors being checked. Be specific. Instead of saying "The document was checked for errors", specify "The document was checked for grammatical errors and factual inaccuracies."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was checked for errors" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that a subject underwent a process of verification to identify and correct mistakes. Ludwig confirms its proper usage in varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was checked for errors" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive verb phrase that indicates a quality control process. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability across diverse writing styles. It is most frequently used in scientific and academic contexts to assure the audience of accuracy and reliability. When using this phrase, it's best to specify the type of errors being checked and who conducted the check to enhance clarity. Related phrases include "was verified for accuracy" and "was validated for correctness".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was verified for accuracy

Focuses on confirming the correctness of the information.

was validated for correctness

Emphasizes the establishment of something being right or true.

was inspected for flaws

Highlights a detailed examination specifically aimed at finding defects.

was scrutinized for mistakes

Suggests a thorough and critical examination to identify errors.

was assessed for inaccuracies

Focuses on the evaluation of potential lack of precision or correctness.

was reviewed for discrepancies

Highlights the process of identifying inconsistencies or disagreements.

underwent error verification

Changes the structure to noun-focused, emphasizing the error verification process itself.

was audited for defects

Implies a systematic and official examination to ensure quality.

was proofread for errors

Specifically focuses on correcting typographical and grammatical errors.

was examined for inaccuracies

Highlights a general examination aimed at identifying incorrect details.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was checked for errors" to sound more formal?

In more formal contexts, consider alternatives like "was verified for accuracy", "was validated for correctness", or "underwent error verification".

What is the difference between "was checked for errors" and "was proofread"?

"Was proofread" specifically implies checking for typographical and grammatical errors, while "was checked for errors" is broader and can include checking for factual inaccuracies, logical inconsistencies, or other types of mistakes.

Is it redundant to say "was checked for errors and mistakes"?

Yes, saying "was checked for errors and mistakes" is somewhat redundant, as "errors" and "mistakes" are largely synonymous. It's better to simply say "was checked for errors" or, if you want to emphasize thoroughness, use a phrase like "was meticulously checked".

Can "was checked for errors" be used in active voice?

Yes, the active voice equivalent would be something like "The team checked the data for errors". Using the active voice can make the sentence more direct and concise.