was noted

USAGE SUMMARY

"was noted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something was noticed or remembered and documented. Example: The fact that she had been particularly helpful was noted in her personnel file.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was noted, though.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Another point was noted, however.

The New Yorker

His talent was noted early.

The Guardian - Sport

Blood was noted gushing from her forehead.

The New York Times

Inevitably, Mr. Clinton's stop was noted.

The New York Times - Food

No complication was noted.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Micrometer reading was noted.

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology

No learning effect was noted.

Hepatology Research

No instrument separation was noted.

Journal of Endodontics

No cellular inflammation was noted.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

The functional status was noted.

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was noted", ensure the context clearly indicates who made the observation or where the information was recorded. This provides clarity and enhances the credibility of your statement.

Common error

While "was noted" is grammatically correct, overuse can make your writing sound passive and less engaging. Vary your sentence structure by using active voice where appropriate to improve readability and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was noted" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been observed or recorded. As Ludwig AI points out, it's widely used in various contexts. The examples show its use in scientific reports, news articles, and general documentation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was noted" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction to indicate that something has been observed, recorded, or mentioned. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for formal writing, especially in scientific and academic contexts, where objectivity is crucial. While it's essential to be mindful of overusing passive voice, "was noted" serves as a reliable way to present information neutrally and professionally. Common alternatives include "was observed" and "was recorded", offering similar nuances depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was observed

Focuses on the act of seeing or perceiving something.

was recorded

Emphasizes the act of documenting something in a written or other permanent form.

was registered

Highlights the act of officially documenting or entering something into a system.

was identified

Focuses on recognizing or establishing what something is.

was detected

Implies discovering something, often something not easily noticeable.

was remarked

Suggests that someone made a comment or observation about something.

was mentioned

Indicates that something was brought up or referred to.

was recognized

Highlights that something was acknowledged or given attention.

it was brought to attention

Emphasizes that something was made known or noticeable.

it came to light

Indicates that something previously unknown became known.

FAQs

How can I use "was noted" in a sentence?

"Was noted" is used to indicate that something was observed, recorded, or mentioned. For example, "It "was noted" that the patient's condition improved after the medication was administered".

What are some alternatives to "was noted"?

Alternatives include "was observed", "was recorded", or "was identified", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was noted"?

While "was noted" is in the passive voice, it's grammatically correct and appropriate in many formal contexts. However, using active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct and engaging. Consider whether using the active voice (e.g., "The researchers noted...") would be clearer or more impactful.

What's the difference between "was noted" and "was observed"?

While similar, "was noted" often implies that something was both observed and recorded or documented, whereas "was observed" primarily emphasizes the act of seeing or perceiving something.