was not reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something, such as a document or a submission, has not undergone a review process. Example: "The report was not reviewed before submission, which may have led to errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It was not reviewed again, until now.

The New York Times

He was not reviewed as often as he should have been.

The New Yorker

This brilliant book was not reviewed anywhere nearly as attentively as it should have been.

The New Yorker

The original said Yvvette Edwards' A Cupboard Full of Coats was not reviewed by any national newspaper.

The Guardian - Books

Christie's added the book to its reference literature, but it was not reviewed by any major journals.

The New Yorker

Despite this, his level of risk was not reviewed and two days later he was found hanged in his cell.

The Guardian

Some of the Patriots were upset that the winning field goal by the Ravens was not reviewed.

The New York Times

I know - a play I wrote a few years ago, A Few White Boys Talking, was not reviewed by the Voice newspaper.

The Guardian - Books

They noted that that an internal report by the officers understated the force used, and that the video was not reviewed by their superiors.

The New York Times

Though that 1926 production was not reviewed in our pages (unless the caricature can be considered a review), several other adaptations of Gatsby have been.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It was not reviewing prosecutorial practices, explained the commission.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not reviewed", clearly state the reason why the review did not occur, if known. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not reviewed" as a blanket statement without explaining the implications or consequences. Always provide context to enhance clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not reviewed" functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of a review process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability, demonstrating its straightforward grammatical role.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

43%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Reference

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not reviewed" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something did not undergo an examination or assessment process. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's versatile and appears frequently in news, scientific, and business contexts. While straightforward, providing context around why something "was not reviewed" enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity. Alternatives like "was not assessed" or "was not examined" can provide nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not assessed

Emphasizes a lack of formal evaluation or judgment.

was not examined

Focuses on the absence of a detailed inspection or investigation.

was not evaluated

Highlights the absence of a systematic appraisal.

was not inspected

Suggests a lack of close scrutiny or official check.

was not checked

Indicates a simple lack of verification or confirmation.

was not audited

Specific to financial or procedural oversight, indicating no formal audit took place.

was not considered

Highlights the absence of any deliberation or contemplation.

was not analyzed

Focuses on the absence of detailed analysis or breakdown.

was not scrutinized

Implies a lack of thorough and critical examination.

remained unexamined

Emphasizes the continuing state of being unexamined.

FAQs

How can I use "was not reviewed" in a sentence?

You can use "was not reviewed" to indicate that something, like a document or process, did not undergo a formal examination. For example: "The proposal "was not reviewed" before submission."

What phrases are similar to "was not reviewed"?

Similar phrases include "was not assessed", "was not examined", or "was not evaluated", all indicating a lack of evaluation or inspection.

Is it better to use "was not reviewed" or "had not been reviewed"?

Both "was not reviewed" and "had not been reviewed" are grammatically correct, but "was not reviewed" is simpler and often preferred unless you need to emphasize the timing of the review in relation to another past event.

What is the difference between "was not reviewed" and "was not revised"?

""was not reviewed"" means something was not examined, while "was not revised" means something was not changed or updated. The focus is different: examination versus modification.