was not evaluated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not evaluated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something has not been assessed or judged, often in academic, scientific, or analytical discussions. Example: "The data collected from the experiment was not evaluated due to time constraints."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Composition of MFP was not evaluated.

Journal of Dairy Science

The overall dilution ratio was not evaluated.

Journal of Aerosol Science

I may also have become a bigger liar on questionnaires, but that was not evaluated.

The New Yorker

In Experiment 1, ejaculated semen was not evaluated.

Animal Reproduction Science

But their combination was not evaluated up-to-date.

Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia

The Army was not evaluated, because of limited data, the report said.

The Washington Post

The optimal time in between graft failure and re-transplant was not evaluated in this study.

Stanford University

Specifically, gender was not evaluated.

Sports Medicine - Open

The refractive status of those patients was not evaluated [1].

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

The amount of biofilm formed was not evaluated.

International Aquatic Research

Second, myocardial oxidative metabolism was not evaluated at follow-up.

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not evaluated", clearly state why it wasn't evaluated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not evaluated" without specifying the reason. The absence of context can leave readers wondering about the significance of the missing evaluation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not evaluated" functions as a passive voice construction indicating the absence of assessment or judgment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and usable. It highlights that a subject has not undergone a process of evaluation, whether due to limitations, scope, or other reasons.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

79%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not evaluated" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has not been assessed or judged. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It is particularly prevalent in scientific and formal contexts, serving to objectively state limitations or scope. When employing this phrase, providing context for why the evaluation was absent is a best practice to enhance clarity. Alternatives such as "was not assessed" or "was not examined" can be used depending on the specific nuance desired.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not assessed

Focuses on the lack of formal assessment or judgment.

was not examined

Highlights the absence of a detailed inspection or analysis.

was not investigated

Emphasizes the lack of a systematic inquiry or study.

was not analyzed

Stresses the absence of a detailed analysis or interpretation.

was not considered

Indicates a lack of thought or attention given to the subject.

was not tested

Focuses on the absence of a practical test or experiment.

was not reviewed

Highlights the lack of a formal review or inspection.

was not checked

Implies the absence of a verification or quality control step.

was not determined

Emphasizes the lack of a conclusive determination or finding.

remained unevaluated

Highlights that something has not been subject to evaluation.

FAQs

How can I use "was not evaluated" in a sentence?

Use "was not evaluated" to indicate that something has not been assessed or judged. For example: "The long-term impact of the policy "was not evaluated" in this study."

What are some alternatives to "was not evaluated"?

You can use alternatives like "was not assessed", "was not examined", or "was not investigated" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was not evaluated" or "has not been evaluated"?

Both "was not evaluated" and "has not been evaluated" are grammatically correct. "Was not evaluated" typically refers to a specific past instance, while "has not been evaluated" implies that something has never been evaluated up to the present.

What does it mean when something "was not evaluated" in a study?

It means that a particular aspect, factor, or variable was not assessed or analyzed within the scope of the study. This could be due to limitations in resources, time, or the specific focus of the research.