was not part of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not part of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something did not belong to or was not included in a particular group, event, or situation. Example: "The proposal was not part of the original plan, but it was considered during the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He was not part of the study.

The New York Times - Health

This was not part of the script.

The New Yorker

Compromise was not part of his platform.

The New York Times

That was not part of his agenda.

The New York Times

I was not part of that decision.

Independent

Wilkes was not part of that world".

The New Yorker

Kennedy was not part of the movement.

The New Yorker

(Dr. Leal was not part of the research).

The New York Times - Science

Cycling was not part of their culture.

The Guardian

Lynching was not part of that history.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It wasn't part of my training.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not part of", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject was excluded from or had no involvement in. Providing specific details enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming the reader understands the scope of what "was not part of". Clearly specify the group, plan, or activity from which something was excluded to prevent misinterpretations. For example, instead of saying 'The decision was not part of the process', specify 'The decision was not part of the initial planning process'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not part of" functions as a predicate adjective phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. It's used to express that something or someone was excluded, absent, or had no involvement in a specific context or entity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not part of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote exclusion or lack of involvement. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its neutral register makes it appropriate for various contexts, including news, science, and business. To ensure clarity, it's essential to specify what the subject was excluded from. While alternatives like "was excluded from" or "was not included in" exist, the best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Keep in mind that this phrase can be useful in providing clarity or correcting a misconception, as confirmed by the numerous examples Ludwig provides.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not included in

Indicates a lack of inclusion in a list, group, or plan.

was excluded from

Focuses on active exclusion from a group or activity.

had no involvement in

Highlights the lack of participation or connection to something.

did not participate in

Directly states the lack of participation in an activity.

was not affiliated with

Emphasizes the absence of an official connection or association.

played no role in

Emphasizes the absence of influence or contribution.

was outside the scope of

Indicates that something falls beyond the defined boundaries or limits.

was absent from

Implies a physical or metaphorical absence from an event or situation.

was unconnected to

Highlights the absence of a link or relationship.

remained separate from

Suggests a deliberate distancing or lack of integration.

FAQs

How can I use "was not part of" in a sentence?

Use "was not part of" to indicate that something was excluded from a group, event, or plan. For example, "The suggestion "was not part of" the original proposal".

What are some alternatives to "was not part of"?

You can use alternatives such as "was excluded from", "was not included in", or "played no role in" depending on the context.

Is there a difference between "was not part of" and "was not included in"?

While similar, "was not part of" generally implies a broader sense of belonging or involvement, whereas "was not included in" often refers to a specific list or collection. Choose "was not included in" when referring to formal documents and lists.

When is it better to use "played no role in" instead of "was not part of"?

Use "played no role in" when emphasizing the absence of influence or contribution to a particular outcome or process. For instance, "The consultant "played no role in" the project's failure".