was excluded from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was excluded from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something was not allowed to participate in or be part of a particular group, event, or situation. Example: "She was excluded from the meeting due to her absence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She was excluded from preseason practice.

The New York Times - Sports

Even Vacanti was excluded from the day-to-day progress.

The New Yorker

But his work was excluded from the 1913 Armory Show.

The New York Times - Arts

"My community was excluded from the planning process," she said.

The New York Times

Lou, Jr., was excluded from the family lunchtime ritual.

The New Yorker

The topic of the debate Bindel was excluded from?

The Guardian

The sector itself was excluded from directly paying the tax.

The Guardian

This case was excluded from further analysis.

Gynecological Surgery

Carbon storage was excluded from the study.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

The patella was excluded from the evaluation.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Therefore, it was excluded from the calculations.

Chemistry Central Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was excluded from" when you want to clearly and directly state that someone or something was intentionally left out or prevented from being part of something. Consider the context to choose the most appropriate synonym if a different nuance is desired.

Common error

Avoid using "exclude" in the active voice when a passive construction is more appropriate. For example, instead of "They excluded her from the team", consider if "She was excluded from the team" better emphasizes her experience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was excluded from" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject experienced an action performed by an external agent. As Ludwig examples show, it highlights the state of being left out or prevented from something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

59%

News & Media

34%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was excluded from" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that a subject has been intentionally left out of something. Ludwig's analysis indicates the phrase is frequently used in scientific and news contexts, implying a deliberate action. While "was excluded from" is generally neutral, considering synonyms like "was barred from" or "was omitted from" can refine the specific nuance. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is accurate and helpful in various writing scenarios, emphasizing the importance of choosing the right words when describing exclusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was disqualified from

Suggests a formal removal due to not meeting requirements.

was prohibited from

Indicates a formal rule or law preventing participation.

was barred from

Indicates a more formal or legal prohibition.

was shut out from

Conveys a sense of complete and often unfair exclusion.

was kept out of

Implies an active effort to prevent inclusion.

was left out of

Indicates a lack of inclusion, possibly unintentional.

was rejected from

Suggests a formal denial of entry or participation.

was omitted from

Suggests a passive removal or oversight.

was removed from

Implies an active taking away from a group or activity.

was denied access to

Focuses on the lack of opportunity or permission to enter or use something.

FAQs

How can I use "was excluded from" in a sentence?

You can use "was excluded from" to indicate that someone or something was not allowed to participate in or be part of a particular group, event, or situation. For example: "The data "was excluded from" the analysis due to inconsistencies".

What are some alternatives to "was excluded from"?

Some alternatives include "was barred from", "was omitted from", "was left out of", or "was kept out of", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was excluded from" or "was not included in"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "was excluded from" implies a deliberate act of leaving something out, while "was not included in" simply means it wasn't part of the group or process. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the intentional exclusion or simply the lack of inclusion.

What is the difference between "was excluded from" and "was exempt from"?

"Was excluded from" means that something or someone was deliberately left out. In contrast, "was exempt from" means that something or someone was specifically excused or freed from an obligation or requirement. For example: "He "was excluded from" the meeting due to a conflict of interest" vs. "She "was exempt from" the tax because of her low income".