was not mentioned

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not mentioned" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was not brought up or discussed in a conversation, text, or document. Example: "The budget for the project was not mentioned during the meeting, which left many team members confused."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

The boy was not mentioned.

The New York Times

American imperialism was not mentioned.

The New Yorker

The Internet was not mentioned.

The New York Times

My existence was not mentioned".

The New Yorker

England was not mentioned.

The Guardian

Randolph was not mentioned.

The New York Times - Sports

Tucker was not mentioned.

The Guardian - Business

Immigration was not mentioned.

The Guardian

One purported advantage was not mentioned, though.

The Economist

The issue was not mentioned again.

The New Yorker

One key advantage, however, was not mentioned.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not mentioned" to objectively state that a particular detail or subject was absent from a discussion, document, or report. This is particularly useful in formal writing where neutrality is important.

Common error

While "was not mentioned" is grammatically sound, avoid overusing passive voice constructions. In some contexts, actively stating who did not mention something can make your writing more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not mentioned" functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of a subject or topic from a discourse, text, or report. Ludwig shows multiple examples where it is used to highlight omissions or absences.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

14%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was not mentioned" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that something was absent from a discussion, document, or report. According to Ludwig, it's frequently used in news and media, as well as scientific contexts, and maintains a neutral tone suitable for various registers. While it's a useful construction, be mindful of overusing the passive voice and consider more active alternatives when appropriate. Remember that while "was not mentioned" simply indicates an absence, other related phrases like "was ignored" imply a deliberate overlooking of a subject.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was omitted

Focuses on the act of leaving something out intentionally or unintentionally.

was excluded

Highlights that something was deliberately left out.

was not included

Emphasizes the absence of something from a list or compilation.

was left out

A more informal way of saying something was not included.

did not come up

Suggests that a topic or item was not brought into the conversation or consideration.

was passed over

Implies that something was deliberately ignored or skipped.

was not touched upon

Indicates a topic was not explored or discussed in detail.

remained unsaid

Highlights that something was known or implied but never explicitly stated.

was disregarded

Emphasizes that something was ignored despite potentially being relevant.

was overlooked

Suggests something was missed or not noticed.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was not mentioned" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was omitted", "was excluded", or "was not included".

What does it mean when something "was not mentioned"?

It means that the specific topic, person, or item did not appear or was not discussed in a particular context, such as a conversation, report, or document.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the phrase "was not mentioned"?

This phrase is suitable for various contexts, including formal reports, news articles, and academic writing, where you need to objectively state that something was absent from a discussion or document.

Is "was not mentioned" the same as "was ignored"?

While both suggest something was absent, "was ignored" implies a deliberate decision to overlook something, whereas "was not mentioned" simply indicates that it didn't come up, without necessarily implying intent.