was omitted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was omitted" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used when something has been omitted or left out. For example, "The line 'I like apples' was omitted from the song."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(The "not" was omitted).

The New York Times

The tail was omitted.

The New York Times

(Ward Marston's name was omitted).

The New York Times

One villain was omitted: the United States.

The New York Times

Who was omitted from our list?

The New York Times

Primary antibody was omitted from negative controls.

Nature

This was omitted by Mr. Barak.

The New York Times

Naomi Campbell was omitted on that criterion.

The Guardian

For the blind test phase, the tail rotor was omitted.

Aerospace Science and Technology

For experiments including dexamethasone, hydrocortisone was omitted from the ECM.

Nature

This column was omitted from some copies of Saturday's paper.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was omitted" when you want to emphasize that something was intentionally or unintentionally left out, rather than simply not included. It is suitable when detailing procedures, reporting results, or correcting errors.

Common error

Avoid using "was omitted" when "was not included" is more appropriate. "Was omitted" implies a prior expectation or potential for inclusion, while "was not included" is a more neutral statement. For example, use "was not included" when describing a list of items where an item was never intended to be part of the list.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was omitted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something has been left out or excluded by an unspecified agent. Ludwig's examples show it used across a wide array of sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

38%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was omitted" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction used to indicate the exclusion of something. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and wide usability. It appears most often in science and news contexts, reflecting its usefulness in technical explanations and reporting. When using "was omitted", consider whether "was not included" or "was removed" might be more appropriate depending on the intended nuance. Related phrases like "was excluded" and "was left out" offer similar meanings with slightly different emphases.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was excluded

Emphasizes a deliberate act of keeping something out.

was left out

Indicates a passive exclusion, either intentional or unintentional.

was excluded from

Specifies the context from which something was removed.

was not included

States a lack of inclusion, without necessarily implying an active omission.

was excluded from consideration

Highlights that something was not considered as an option.

was disregarded

Suggests a conscious decision to ignore or overlook something.

was overlooked

Implies an unintentional failure to notice or consider something.

was skipped

Indicates a passing over or avoidance of something.

was removed

Focuses on the act of taking something away.

was dispensed with

Implies that something was no longer deemed necessary.

FAQs

How can I use "was omitted" in a sentence?

Use "was omitted" to indicate that something has been left out or excluded from a text, list, or process. For instance, "The concluding paragraph was omitted from the published version".

What can I say instead of "was omitted"?

You can use alternatives like "was excluded", "was left out", or "was not included" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was omitted" or "was not included"?

"Was omitted" implies a deliberate act or oversight in leaving something out, while "was not included" is a more neutral statement simply indicating absence. The best choice depends on the intended emphasis.

What's the difference between "was omitted" and "was removed"?

"Was omitted" suggests something was never present or was intentionally left out, whereas "was removed" indicates something was initially present but later taken away.