was not incorporated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not incorporated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not included or officially added to a larger entity or document. Example: "The new policy was not incorporated into the existing framework, leading to confusion among the staff."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

St. Stephen's was not incorporated in New York.

The New York Times

But the knowledge gained from these efforts was not  incorporated into more generalised macroeconomic models.

The Economist

At Edgewood, psychochemical research was not incorporated into the Medical Research Volunteer Program, for clinical studies, until 1956.

The New Yorker

Cathaysia, a landmass comprising the former tectonic plates of North and South China, was not incorporated into Pangea.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Though AVM had been winning contracts with the racing association since 1989, the company was not incorporated at the time it was awarded the glass-wall contract.

The New York Times - Sports

We used lots of stuff to make tables that was not incorporated into the finished product, like sandpaper and material for jigs and fixtures.

The New York Times

The risk of fire was not incorporated.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

However, it was not incorporated into any curriculum plans.

Comparative Migration Studies

All probability distributions were triangular and independent, and the risk of fire was not incorporated.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Specifically, the risk of delayed and complicated heart surgery as a severe RSV-related complication was not incorporated.

Health Economics Review

This dimension was not incorporated in the fit, as it would have complicated the fit by another dimension.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not incorporated", ensure the context clearly indicates what was excluded and why. This helps avoid ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was not incorporated" when "was never considered" is more accurate. "Incorporated" implies a step towards inclusion that never happened, whereas "considered" focuses on initial deliberation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not incorporated" functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of inclusion or integration of something into a larger whole. Ludwig examples showcase its use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

22%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not incorporated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression for indicating that something was excluded or not integrated into a larger entity or system. As per Ludwig AI, the expression is perfectly valid and usable in written English. Its use is particularly common in scientific and news contexts. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; ensure the context elucidates what was not included and the reasoning behind its exclusion. Consider alternatives like "was not included" or "was excluded" to fine-tune the nuance of your writing. Despite its frequent use, the term is mostly found in scientific and formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not included

A more general alternative, simply stating the absence of inclusion without specifying a reason or process.

was excluded

Indicates a direct removal or prevention of inclusion, differing slightly in emphasis from simply not being included.

was not part of

States that something was external or separate, rather than being added or included.

was not integrated

Focuses on the lack of integration into a system or structure, highlighting the process of combining elements.

was omitted

Suggests a deliberate act of leaving something out, which may not always be the case with "was not incorporated".

was left out

An informal way of saying something was not included, implying a simpler process or reason.

was absent from

Highlights the lack of presence in a particular context or situation.

did not encompass

Suggests a wider scope or coverage that failed to include something specific.

was not comprised of

Indicates that something was not a constituent part of a whole.

was not featured in

Focuses on the lack of appearance or prominence in a specific context.

FAQs

What does "was not incorporated" mean?

The phrase "was not incorporated" means that something was not included or integrated into a larger system, plan, or document. It suggests that the item in question remained separate or excluded.

How can I use "was not incorporated" in a sentence?

You can use "was not incorporated" to indicate that a specific element was left out of a particular process or structure. For example: "The suggestion "was not incorporated" into the final design".

What are some alternatives to "was not incorporated"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was not included", "was excluded", or "was omitted". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "was not included" or "was not incorporated"?

Both "was not included" and "was not incorporated" are correct, but they have slightly different implications. "Was not included" is more general, while "was not incorporated" suggests a more formal process of integration that did not occur.