was not described

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not described" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something has not been detailed or explained in a particular context. Example: "The process was not described in the manual, leaving users confused about how to proceed."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The other photograph was not described.

The New York Times - Sports

It was not described that way by the administration.

The Guardian

The nature of the assault was not described.

The New York Times

At this stage, though, I'm wondering about another "pull" that was not described above.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Autism was not described in the medical literature until 1943.

The New York Times

In this particular study, the collagen was not described in detail.

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Discovered in 1979, it was not described as a species until now.

The New York Times - Science

The substance of what was said was not described in the State Department's brief account.

The New York Times

An extraordinary gain by Commercial Credit of $2,6416044, or 43 cents a share, was not described.

The New York Times

This dataset contains an additional RRBS sample (X9017) that was not described in our primary research article.

Nature

The two Kevalis men share the same address, but their relationship was not described by the police.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not described" to clearly indicate that information is missing or has not been provided in a particular context. Ensure the context is clear to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "was not described" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing seem vague or indirect. Consider using active voice where appropriate to make your writing more engaging and direct.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not described" primarily functions as a passive construction, indicating the absence of a detailed account or depiction. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically sound. The examples from Ludwig demonstrate its use across varied contexts, signaling that something lacked proper detailing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

33%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not described" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive construction that indicates a lack of detail or explanation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and numerous examples from various sources demonstrate its broad applicability, particularly in scientific and news contexts. When writing, while "was not described" is perfectly acceptable, make an effort to avoid overusing passive voice. Related phrases like "was not detailed" and "was not explained" can offer subtle variations in meaning. Be mindful of the context to ensure clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not detailed

Focuses specifically on the absence of thoroughness in the explanation.

was not specified

Emphasizes the lack of explicit information or requirements.

was not explained

Highlights the absence of clarification or understanding provided.

was not mentioned

Indicates a complete lack of reference or acknowledgement.

was not outlined

Suggests a lack of structured presentation or summary.

remained unmentioned

Highlights the state of not being brought up or discussed.

was left unsaid

Emphasizes the deliberate omission of certain information.

was not illustrated

Focuses on the absence of visual or descriptive support.

was not clarified

Emphasizes the lack of making something easier to understand.

went unremarked

Suggests the lack of attention or comment given to something.

FAQs

How can I use "was not described" in a sentence?

You can use "was not described" to indicate that something lacked detail or explanation in a specific context. For instance, "The process "was not described" in the manual, leaving users confused".

What are some alternatives to "was not described"?

Alternatives include "was not detailed", "was not specified", or "was not explained", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing something that is missing information?

While "was not described" is in the passive voice and perfectly acceptable, using the active voice may sometimes be more direct. For example, instead of "The method "was not described"", you could say "The author did not describe the method".

What is the difference between "was not described" and "was not explained"?

"Was not described" implies a lack of detail or depiction, whereas "was not explained" implies a lack of clarification or understanding. While similar, "described" focuses on the presentation of information, and "explained" focuses on making the information comprehensible.