Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was not explained

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not explained" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was not clarified or detailed in a previous context or discussion. Example: "The reason for the delay was not explained during the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Why that had happened was not explained.

News & Media

The New York Times

The new total was not explained.

News & Media

The New York Times

Treatment adherence was not explained by demographic variables.

As is the court's custom, it was not explained.

The discrepancy was not explained in the document.

How exactly the reform fulfilled this promise was not explained.

Accumulation of HLA-DR was not explained by altered cathepsin S activity.

How this step ties in with the economic reforms was not explained.

The association of trauma and hallucinations was not explained by the mediational variables.

Moreover, this greater attractiveness was not explained by correlated perceptions of Big 5 traits.

This difference in risk taking because of AP medications was not explained by history of psychosis.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not explained", ensure the context clearly indicates what or who failed to provide the explanation. This adds clarity and strengthens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "was not explained" without a clear antecedent. Ensure it's immediately obvious what the 'it' refers to. For example, instead of "It was not explained", specify "The cause of the error was not explained".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not explained" functions as a passive voice construction indicating a lack of clarification or detailing of a particular subject. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable form in English, emphasizing its role in pointing out omissions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

40%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not explained" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a lack of clarity or detail. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English across diverse fields like News & Media, Science, and Academia. Its neutral register allows for versatile application, though clear antecedents are essential for avoiding vagueness. Alternatives such as "was not clarified" or "remained unclarified" offer subtle variations in meaning, and its consistent presence in authoritative sources underscores its reliability.

FAQs

How can I use "was not explained" in a sentence?

Use "was not explained" to indicate a lack of clarification or detail about something. For example: "The reason for his absence "was not explained" in the report".

What are some alternatives to "was not explained"?

Alternatives include "was not clarified", "remained unclear", or "was left unsaid". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was not explained"?

Yes, "was not explained" is grammatically correct. It's the passive voice of the verb "explain" in the past tense, indicating that something received a lack of explanation.

What is the difference between "was not explained" and "was not understood"?

"Was not explained" means that no explanation was given, whereas "was not understood" means that an explanation was given but not comprehended. The former focuses on the lack of information, while the latter focuses on the lack of comprehension.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: