was not covered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not covered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a particular topic, subject, or area was not addressed or included in a discussion, document, or presentation. Example: "The report was thorough, but it was not covered in detail the financial implications of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Her mouth was not covered.

The New York Times

That was not covered in the proxy.

The New York Times

"My face was not covered by a veil," she said.

The New York Times

The renal vitamin, at $21.89, was not covered.

The New York Times

Then his insurer said the physical therapy was not covered.

The New York Times - Health

Komolafe pointed to a regular wall that was not covered with whiteboard paint.

The New Yorker

"He was handcuffed and shackled but his face was not covered.

The Guardian

It was not covered in any state law except California's," Ross said.

The Guardian

This was not covered by the laboriously negotiated generic specification for Gaviscon liquid.

The Guardian

The main body of my submission was not covered in my evidence session with Butler.

The Guardian - Opinion

Because Knauer's condition was deemed an illness, it was not covered by the athletic department's insurance.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was not covered" to clearly indicate when a topic, item, or area falls outside the scope of a discussion, report, or insurance policy. This phrase clearly sets boundaries and manages expectations.

Common error

While "was not covered" is grammatically correct, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound less direct. Consider rephrasing to use the active voice where appropriate for greater clarity and impact, for example, "the report omitted this detail."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not covered" functions as a passive construction indicating that something was excluded or not included within a specific scope. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's a grammatically correct way to express that something was omitted or not addressed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

41%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not covered" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate that something was excluded or not included within a particular context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely accepted. While it is appropriate for various settings, ranging from news reports to scientific publications, more formal vocabulary might be preferable in academic writing. It's important to be mindful of the passive voice and consider using active constructions for greater clarity. Common synonyms include "was not included", "was not addressed", and "was not mentioned". Remember to set clear boundaries and expectations by using "was not covered" when specifying the limits of a discussion, report, or policy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not included

Focuses on the aspect of inclusion, implying something was deliberately or unintentionally left out.

was not addressed

Emphasizes that a specific point or issue was not tackled or discussed.

was not encompassed

Highlights that something fell outside the boundaries or scope of what was being considered.

was not comprised

Indicates that something was not a part of the whole or a specific group.

was not featured

Implies that something was absent from a presentation, publication, or display.

was not discussed

Highlights the absence of conversation or deliberation about a particular topic.

was not detailed

Suggests that something was not elaborated upon or thoroughly explained.

was not mentioned

Indicates that something was completely omitted from a conversation, document, or report.

was not touched on

Implies that something was not even briefly addressed or considered.

was not examined

Focuses on the lack of investigation or analysis of a specific subject.

FAQs

How can I use "was not covered" in a sentence?

You can use "was not covered" to indicate that a specific topic, item, or area was excluded or not addressed. For example, "The financial impact "was not covered" in the initial report."

What's a formal alternative to "was not covered"?

In formal contexts, consider using phrases such as "was not included", "was not addressed", or "was not encompassed" to convey a similar meaning with a more professional tone. For example, "The implications of the policy change "were not addressed" in the document."

What are some common synonyms for "was not covered"?

Some common synonyms include "was not included", "was not mentioned", or "was not detailed". The best choice depends on the specific context. For example, "That specific aspect "was not mentioned" during the presentation."

Is it correct to use "wasn't covered" instead of "was not covered"?

Yes, "wasn't covered" is a perfectly acceptable contraction of "was not covered", especially in informal contexts. In formal writing, it's generally preferred to use the full form, "was not covered".