was not contributed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not provided or given by someone or something in a specific context. Example: "The information for the report was not contributed by the team members, leading to gaps in the final document."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

However, the high ratio was not contributed to by high ω − 3 fatty acids, but by the low content of ω − 6 fatty acids.

BioMed Research International

They also thought that the current behavior of girls was not contributed to by HPV vaccination, for example, one girl in Nakasongola said "A girl will not start sex because she will know the dangers involved".

BMC Public Health

One inbred, LP5, was of particular interest in that a large, central portion of chromosome 5 was not contributed by B73, but its centromere still had high SNP similarity to B73, particularly in the area of the left peak.

Genetics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

He explained that his wife had a job but was not contributing to the household expenses.

The Guardian

When it came to the numbers Torres was not contributing any less than the other strikers, Antoine Griezmann apart.

The Guardian - Sport

Results for efficiency showed that a substantial part of the reserve system was not contributing to conservation targets.

Biological Conservation

The team also found that university research was not contributing to the technological advancement of industry and commerce.

Science Magazine

However, detailed analysis suggested that the BRCA1 mutation was not contributing to the CRCs observed.

British Journal of Cancer

Although employed, he was not contributing to the household, exacerbating Mercy's sense of disappointment and abandonment.

Health and Place

These apparently are the residues of a natural concentrating process and were not contributed by other sources.

Encyclopedia Britannica

These results indicate that the nuc-1 rescuing activity is not contributed by neighboring engulfing cells.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the passive voice, ensure the agent (the one performing the action) is either unknown, unimportant, or you wish to de-emphasize it. For example, "The error was not contributed deliberately" shifts focus from who made the error to the nature of the error itself.

Common error

Avoid using the passive voice excessively. While "was not contributed" is grammatically correct, overuse can make your writing sound weak or unclear. Consider using the active voice (e.g., "did not contribute") when the actor is known and relevant.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not contributed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something did not receive input or addition from an unspecified agent. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. The passive voice emphasizes the recipient rather than the giver of the action.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not contributed" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to emphasize the absence of input or involvement from an unspecified agent. Ludwig AI confirms this. While infrequent overall, its usage is most common in scientific and news contexts. When writing, consider the active voice alternative "did not contribute" if you want to focus on the actor rather than the action. Although acceptable, be mindful of overuse of the passive voice to maintain clarity and conciseness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not provided

Focuses on the act of supplying or furnishing something that is needed or wanted.

was not supplied

Highlights the act of providing something necessary or useful.

was not given

Emphasizes the act of bestowing or handing over something.

was not furnished

Indicates that something was not equipped or fitted out with what was necessary.

was not added

Focuses on the inclusion of something as an increment or supplement.

was not offered

Emphasizes the act of presenting something for acceptance or rejection.

was not submitted

Highlights the act of presenting something for consideration or approval.

did not contribute

Active voice version, focusing on the lack of action by a subject.

was not responsible for

Indicates a lack of causation or origination.

played no part in

Emphasizes the absence of involvement or influence.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was not contributed" in the active voice?

You can rephrase "was not contributed" in the active voice as "did not contribute". This shifts the focus from the object to the subject performing the action, resulting in a more direct statement.

What's a more formal alternative to "was not contributed"?

A more formal alternative could be "was not provided" or "was not supplied". These options are suitable for professional or academic writing contexts where a higher degree of formality is expected.

Is it always better to use the active voice instead of "was not contributed"?

No, it's not always better. The passive voice, as in "was not contributed", is useful when the actor is unknown, irrelevant, or when you want to emphasize the action itself. The choice depends on the specific context and the desired emphasis.

When is it appropriate to use "was not contributed" in a sentence?

It is appropriate when you want to emphasize that something was lacking in its provision, without necessarily focusing on who or what failed to provide it. For instance, "The data for this study "was not contributed" by external sources" emphasizes the origin of the data.