was not supplied

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was not supplied" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not provided or given, often in contexts such as reports, forms, or technical documentation. Example: "The required information for the application was not supplied, which delayed the processing time."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

That proof was not supplied.

The New York Times

On account of governmental priority regulations this equipment was not supplied within the three weeks period.

Harvard University

The only difference is that a background spectrum was not supplied to the tool (i.e. bkg="").

Harvard University

As nitrite was not supplied, the most abundant nitrite transporter (kuste3055) was down-regulated 36-fold.

Nature

Reactor I was operated as a control reactor and was not supplied with NO.

Nature

Air was not supplied at the lower zone whereas aeration was given to the upper zone where the membrane filtration was carried out.

Desalination

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Utensils were not supplied.

The New York Times

Water, he says, is not supplied.

The Guardian

Many communities were not supplied with ice at all.

Cornell University

If key is not supplied or is nil, the sequence element itself is used.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

If float-2 is not supplied, its value is (float 1 float-1).

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not supplied", ensure the context clearly indicates what should have been provided and why it was absent. This helps avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was not supplied" when an active voice construction is more direct and impactful. For instance, instead of "The information was not supplied by the source", consider "The source did not supply the information".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not supplied" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that an action (supplying) was not performed on a particular subject. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It's commonly used to report a deficiency or absence of something expected.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

29%

News & Media

29%

Academia

21%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was not supplied" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive voice construction indicating that something expected was absent. According to Ludwig AI, it's suitable for formal and technical contexts, and often appears in science, news, and academic writing. While alternatives like "was not provided" or "was not furnished" exist, "was not supplied" effectively conveys the lack of provision in a clear and concise manner. To avoid overuse, consider active voice alternatives where appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not furnished

Uses 'furnished' instead of 'supplied', implying a similar lack of provision.

was not provided

Replaces 'supplied' with 'provided', offering a direct synonym with nearly identical meaning.

was not given

Substitutes 'supplied' with 'given', suggesting a lack of bestowal.

was unavailable

Indicates the item or information in question could not be accessed or obtained.

was not delivered

Focuses on the action of delivering, implying it did not occur.

was not equipped

Emphasizes a lack of necessary equipment or resources.

was absent

Simple and direct, indicating a lack of presence.

did not include

Focuses on the act of including, indicating exclusion.

was missing

Suggests something is lost or not present when it should be.

was not accessible

Implies that something existed but could not be reached or obtained.

FAQs

How can I use "was not supplied" in a sentence?

Use "was not supplied" to indicate that something expected or required was not provided. For example, "The necessary documentation "was not supplied", delaying the process."

What are some alternatives to "was not supplied"?

Alternatives include "was not provided", "was not furnished", or "was not given". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to use "was not supplied" or "was not provided"?

Both "was not supplied" and "was not provided" are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. "Provided" might be slightly more common in everyday language, but "supplied" works well in formal or technical contexts.

What is the difference between "was not supplied" and "was unavailable"?

"Was not supplied" implies that something should have been furnished but wasn't. "Was unavailable" suggests that something existed but could not be accessed or obtained, without necessarily implying it should have been provided. The context dictates the appropriate choice.