was not added

USAGE SUMMARY

"was not added" is a valid and grammatically correct phrase.
You can use it whenever you need to describe the absence of something that has been added. For example: "The new rule was not added to the policy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The butterfly was not added until 1956.

The New York Times - Sports

But the exemption was not added.

The New York Times

The city was not added to the list until the day before it was finalized.

The New Yorker

Had the message "This item was not added to iCloud because an error occurred"?

The Guardian - Tech

For years, radioactive tritium was not added, because remote-handling requirements complicated the experiments.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Trace element was not added to a case of.

AMB Express

Noise was not added to the synthetic dataset.

Earth, Planets and Space

For that reason Oman was not added to a group.

Large-scale Assessments in Education

Hence, salt was not added in this study.

International Journal of Industrial Chemistry

Phosphorus was determined to be adequate in soils at the experiment site so was not added.

Pedobiologia

The difference from batch experiment I was that the centrifuged sludge was not added.

AMB Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was not added", ensure the context clearly indicates what item or element was omitted and why its absence is significant.

Common error

Avoid using "was not added" when a more specific verb like "removed", "deleted", or "edited out" more accurately describes the action. Always choose the verb that best reflects the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was not added" functions as a passive construction indicating the absence of an action. It highlights that something was not included or appended. As Ludwig's AI indicates, it's a valid and grammatically correct phrase used to describe the absence of something that has been added.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

21%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was not added" is a grammatically sound passive construction frequently employed to denote the absence or exclusion of something. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is valid and grammatically correct. Its prevalence in scientific literature, news reports, and encyclopedic entries underscores its suitability for formal and objective communication. While alternatives like "was omitted" or "was excluded" exist, "was not added" offers a clear and direct way to convey that an item or element was never included. Understanding its appropriate usage ensures precision and clarity in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was not included

A direct synonym, highlighting the lack of inclusion.

was excluded

This alternative emphasizes the act of keeping something out or preventing its inclusion.

was not incorporated

Focuses on the absence of integration into a larger system or structure.

was omitted

This focuses on the act of intentionally leaving something out.

was left out

Emphasizes the act of being excluded, often unintentionally.

was not introduced

Focuses on the absence of a formal presentation or addition.

was not attached

Focuses on the lack of physical or conceptual connection.

was not appended

Indicates that something was not attached or added to the end.

was not supplemented

Highlights the absence of additional material or resources.

was not affixed

Suggests that something was not fastened or attached securely.

FAQs

How can I use "was not added" in a sentence?

Use "was not added" to indicate that something was intentionally or unintentionally left out. For example, "The amendment "was not added" to the final version of the bill."

What are some alternatives to "was not added"?

Alternatives include "was omitted", "was excluded", or "was not included", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "wasn't added" instead of "was not added"?

Yes, "wasn't added" is a contraction of "was not added" and is perfectly acceptable in informal contexts. The choice depends on the desired level of formality.

What is the difference between "was not added" and "was removed"?

"Was not added" means something was never included, while "was removed" implies it was initially present but subsequently taken away. For example, "The feature "was not added" in the first place" versus "The feature "was removed" due to performance issues".