was managed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was managed by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate who was responsible for overseeing or directing a particular task or project in the past. Example: "The project was managed by a team of experienced professionals who ensured its success."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Discharge planning was managed by nurse or social-work case managers.

Critical Care

The group was managed by Berra.

The New York Times - Sports

And, 24 years ago, it was managed by Alex Ferguson.

The New York Times - Sports

Bianchi was managed by Todt's son, Nicholas.

The Guardian - Sport

It was managed by university employees.

The Guardian

The campaign was managed by Anatoly Chubais.

The Guardian

This was managed by our intelligence division," Mr. Kelly said.

The New York Times

The coup was "managed" by the UK, US and Israel.

The Guardian - Books

It was managed by bronchodilators without recurrence.

Annals of Intensive Care

She was managed by multiple ophthalmologists and rheumatologists.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

Child care was managed by various people across time.

Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was managed by", ensure clarity about who or what performed the management and the scope of their responsibilities. Be specific for better understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "was managed by" without clearly specifying the managing entity. Saying 'the project was managed' leaves the reader wondering who was in charge. Always specify who or what did the managing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was managed by" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject received management from an agent. As supported by Ludwig's examples, it specifies who or what was in charge or controlled a particular entity or process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was managed by" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate who or what was responsible for overseeing or controlling something. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and wiki articles. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the managing entity to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "was overseen by" or "was directed by" for nuanced meanings. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, you can effectively use "was managed by" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was overseen by

Emphasizes supervision and guidance rather than direct control.

was supervised by

Similar to 'overseen', highlighting a monitoring role.

was administered by

Focuses on the execution and handling of tasks or processes.

was directed by

Highlights the act of giving instructions and guidance.

was controlled by

Emphasizes the power and influence exerted over something.

was handled by

Focuses on the manner in which something was dealt with.

was coordinated by

Highlights the organization and arrangement of different elements.

was run by

Emphasizes the operational aspect of management.

was conducted by

Focuses on the process of carrying out or performing a task.

was operated by

Emphasizes the functional execution and maintenance of a system or process.

FAQs

How can I use "was managed by" in a sentence?

Use "was managed by" to indicate who or what had control or direction over something in the past. For example, "The campaign "was managed by" Anatoly Chubais."

What are some alternatives to "was managed by"?

Alternatives include "was overseen by", "was administered by", or "was directed by" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing management?

While passive voice with "was managed by" is grammatically correct, active voice (e.g., 'The team managed the project') can often be more direct and engaging. Choose the voice that best suits your writing style and the context.

What is the difference between "was managed by" and "was handled by"?

"Was managed by" typically implies a broader scope of responsibility including planning and oversight. "Was handled by" suggests dealing with specific tasks or situations within a larger framework. For example, "The crisis "was handled by" the PR team" while "The company "was managed by" the CEO".