was handled by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was handled by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate who managed or took care of a particular task or situation. Example: "The project was handled by the marketing team, who ensured everything was completed on time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Instead, it was handled by Parson.

The New Yorker

The sale was handled by Sotheby's International Realty.

The New York Times

The remission of gold was handled by arbitrageurs.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The case was handled by assistants of Mr. Comey.

The New York Times

The Lovings' case was handled by two young volunteer A.C.L.U.

The New Yorker

The catering was handled by Estelle Thompson, of Terrytown.

The New Yorker

In addition, Mancuso criticized how the rerun situation was handled by race officials.

The New York Times - Sports

The rest was handled by Geely, according to the two companies.

The New York Times

Missing stage was handled by multiple imputation approach.

Cancer Epidemiology

We spoke to the victim to find out how the issue was handled by his bank.

TechCrunch

In Washington, D.C., Definers was handled by Andy Stone under Facebook's chief lobbyist, Joel Kaplan.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was handled by", ensure the subject performing the action is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The catering was handled by Estelle Thompson, of Terrytown" provides a clear understanding of who was responsible.

Common error

Avoid using "was handled by" without specifying who or what did the handling. Vague language weakens the sentence and leaves the reader wondering who was responsible. Always specify the agent: e.g., instead of "The situation was handled", write "The situation was handled by the customer service team."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was handled by" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating who or what was responsible for managing, dealing with, or taking care of a particular task, situation, or item. Ludwig examples show its usage across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

23%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was handled by" is a versatile and commonly used passive voice construction. As verified by Ludwig, it effectively communicates who or what was responsible for managing a particular situation or task. While generally acceptable across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing, it's important to ensure clarity by explicitly stating the agent responsible for the action. For more formal settings, consider alternatives such as "was managed by" or "was administered by". By following these guidelines, you can confidently and accurately use "was handled by" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was managed by

Indicates control and direction, similar to handling.

was overseen by

Suggests supervision and guidance during the process.

was administered by

Focuses on the organizational aspect of managing something.

was taken care of by

Emphasizes the attentiveness and care given during the process.

was dealt with by

Highlights the act of addressing and resolving issues.

was executed by

Focuses on the performance or implementation of a task.

was implemented by

Highlights the practical application and execution of a plan.

was coordinated by

Stresses the organized and synchronized approach to managing something.

was supervised by

Emphasizes the monitoring and oversight of a task or process.

was conducted by

Focuses on the performance and carrying out of a task or activity.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was handled by" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was managed by", "was administered by", or "was overseen by". These alternatives often convey a greater sense of authority and control.

Is "was handled by" appropriate for academic writing?

Yes, "was handled by" is generally acceptable in academic writing, especially when describing processes or methodologies. However, consider using more precise language if possible. For example, "was addressed by" or "was resolved by" might be more suitable depending on the context.

What is the difference between "was handled by" and "was dealt with by"?

While both phrases indicate how a situation was managed, "was handled by" suggests a broader scope of management, while "was dealt with by" often implies addressing specific problems or issues. The choice depends on whether you're emphasizing overall management or problem resolution.

Can I use "was handled by" to describe abstract concepts?

Yes, "was handled by" can be used to describe how abstract concepts, such as data or information, were managed or processed. For instance, "Missing data "was handled by" multiple imputation approach."