Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was indicative of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was indicative of" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that shows or suggests a particular idea or situation. Example: The sudden increase in sales was indicative of a growing demand for organic products.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was indicative of till deformation.

Science & Research

Nature

The crumbling was indicative of brittle failure.

This was indicative of niche segregation.

Science

Biosystems

Pera said that was indicative of Harden's uncomplicated nature.

The dedication was indicative of the book's tone.

Perhaps it was indicative of Edward's secretly misanthropic self.

Yesterday's meek surrender was indicative of their performances.

The sending off was indicative of Inter's inability to cope.

It was indicative of the Mets' inability to generate offense.

"It was indicative of the culture," Dambly said.

Some of this evidence was indicative of Delaney's guilt of the offenses charged in the indictment.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was indicative of", ensure the connection between the observation and the underlying cause is clear and logical to avoid ambiguity. Provide sufficient context for the reader to understand the relationship.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because something "was indicative of" a particular outcome, it directly caused that outcome. "Indication" suggests a relationship or sign, but doesn't prove causation. Always consider other potential factors.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was indicative of" functions as a linking verb phrase, connecting a subject with a predicate adjective that describes a quality or characteristic of the subject. It suggests that the subject serves as evidence or a sign of something else. As shown by Ludwig, it's a standard grammatical construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

9%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was indicative of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that suggests a sign or symptom of something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard phrase. Predominantly found in news, scientific, and academic writing, it serves to connect an observation with a broader context. To ensure clear communication, avoid assuming causation based solely on indication. For alternative phrasing, consider options like "suggested", "pointed to", or "signified", adjusting based on the intended nuance. By understanding its usage, potential pitfalls, and available alternatives, you can effectively incorporate this phrase into your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was indicative of" in a sentence?

Use "was indicative of" to suggest that something serves as a sign or symptom of something else. For instance, "The decline in sales "was indicative of" a broader economic downturn."

What are some alternatives to "was indicative of"?

You can use alternatives like "suggested", "pointed to", or "signified" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Each alternative offers a slightly different shade of meaning.

Is it always appropriate to use "was indicative of" in formal writing?

Yes, "was indicative of" is suitable for formal writing. However, ensure that its usage is precise and that there's a clear connection between the indicative element and what it signifies.

What's the difference between "was indicative of" and "was a result of"?

"Was indicative of" implies a sign or symptom, whereas "was a result of" implies direct causation. For example, "The red sky at night "was indicative of" good weather", but "The flood "was a result of" heavy rainfall".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: