was a result of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was a result of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the cause or origin of a certain situation. For example: The financial strain experienced by the company was a result of their poor budgeting decisions.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was a result of mine also.

The New York Times - Science

This was a result of the protests.

The New York Times - Magazine

That failure was a result of a brittle fracture.

University of California, Berkeley

The order was a result of a Labor Department complaint.

The New York Times

This was a result of an unusual geoglogical catastrophe.

The New York Times

"It was a result of hatred and discrimination.

The New York Times

Holik's goal was a result of such persistence.

The New York Times - Sports

Diana Levine's unfortunate injury was a result of human error.

The New York Times

"Take a Giant Step" was a result of that training.

The New York Times - Arts

Its Durban stance was a result of that.

The Guardian

The first was a result of the Chernobyl disaster.

The Telegraph

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To improve readability, consider varying your sentence structure. If overused, "was a result of" can make your writing repetitive; alternatives such as "stemmed from" or "arose from" can add variety.

Common error

Avoid using "was a result of" in overly simple sentences where a more direct verb would suffice. For instance, instead of "The delay was a result of the rain", try "The rain delayed the event".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was a result of" functions as a causal connector, linking an effect to its cause. Ludwig AI shows it's used to explain how one event or situation directly led to another.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Academia

23%

Science

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was a result of" is a highly common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate causation. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriateness in various contexts, particularly in news, academic writing, and scientific discourse. When writing with "was a result of", ensure the connection between cause and effect is clear, and consider using alternative phrases for variety. According to Ludwig, this expression serves to provide explanations and offer understanding to the audience, establishing direct links from causes to their corresponding outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was caused by

Emphasizes the direct cause of an event or situation.

happened because of

States a straightforward reason for an occurrence.

was due to

States that something is attributable or owed to a particular cause.

was a product of

Suggests that something is the result of a process or influence.

arose from

Uses a verb indicating emergence or beginning due to a cause.

was a consequence of

Highlights that something is a direct outcome or effect.

stemmed from

Replaces "was a result of" with a verb that indicates origin or derivation.

was brought about by

Emphasizes the action that caused something to happen.

originated from

Indicates the origin or starting point of something.

derived from

Indicates that something is obtained or developed from a source.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "was a result of"?

You can use alternatives like "stemmed from", "was caused by", or "was due to" depending on the context.

How to use "was a result of" in a sentence?

The phrase "was a result of" is used to indicate causation, such as "The company's success was a result of innovative marketing strategies".

Is it correct to say "was the result of" instead of "was a result of"?

While "was the result of" is grammatically correct, "was a result of" is also widely accepted and used, especially when referring to one of many possible causes.

What's the difference between "was a result of" and "was because of"?

"Was a result of" and "was because of" are similar, but "was a result of" often implies a more formal or distanced cause-and-effect relationship, while "was because of" can sound more conversational.