was included in

USAGE SUMMARY

"was included in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to state that something was part of a larger group or collection. For example: "The story of Cinderella was included in the anthology of fairy tales."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

(Virginia was included in Tuesday's announcement).

The New York Times

The company was included in Inc.

The New York Times

He was included in Plutarch's Lives.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Mr. Roberts was included in that call.

The New York Times

Paul" — was included in the Mitchell report.

The New York Times - Sports

Parents raised issues around what was included in the books.

The Guardian

The first women's race was included in 1912.

The New York Times - Sports

This year, the patch was included in the stimulus bill.

The New York Times

Other reports say Sam Bradford was included in the offer.

The Guardian - Sport

"It was included in the dossier against our wishes.

The New York Times

It is eight; Alabama was included in error.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was included in", ensure that the context clearly indicates what larger entity the subject was a part of. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was included in" when the subject was merely associated with, but not actually a component of, the larger entity. Using more precise language improves accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was included in" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject was a component or element of a larger group, collection, or entity. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. Ludwig examples illustrate diverse applications across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

42%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was included in" is a versatile and grammatically sound passive construction used to indicate that something was a part of a larger entity. As verified by Ludwig AI, its frequent occurrence across various sources, including news, science, and encyclopedias, highlights its broad applicability. While generally neutral in register, paying attention to context helps ensure accuracy when indicating relationships. Remember to avoid using it when the subject was merely associated but not truly a component of the larger group.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was incorporated into

Focuses on the act of formally adding something to a larger entity.

was integrated into

Highlights the process of combining something into a cohesive whole.

was integrated with

Focuses on the process of connecting one element to another to work as a whole.

was featured in

Implies a prominent placement or showcasing within something.

was comprised within

Emphasizes the idea of being contained or encompassed within a set.

was listed among

Suggests being part of a catalog or enumeration of items.

was encompassed by

Highlights the idea of being completely surrounded or contained.

was absorbed into

Focuses on the process of being taken in and becoming part of something.

was subsumed under

Suggests being classified or categorized within a larger group.

was accounted for in

Implies that something was considered or taken into consideration in a calculation or analysis.

FAQs

How can I use "was included in" in a sentence?

Use "was included in" to indicate that something formed a part of a larger whole or group. For example, "The chapter on genetics was included in the biology textbook".

What are some alternatives to "was included in"?

Alternatives include "was featured in", "was part of", or "was incorporated into", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was included in" or "is included in"?

The choice depends on the time frame. "Was included in" refers to something that happened in the past, while "is included in" refers to something that is currently included.

What's the difference between "was included in" and "was involved in"?

"Was included in" means something was a component or part of something else. "Was involved in" implies participation or association, but not necessarily being a direct component.