was added to

USAGE SUMMARY

'was added to' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has been added to something else, either literally or figuratively. For example, "A new section on health and wellness was added to the company employee handbook."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Insult was added to injury.

The New York Times - Science

So Memuna was added to the list.

The New Yorker

Manhattan Shirts was added to the portfolio.

The New York Times

That was added to the wish list.

The New York Times

(Eventually, vinegar was added to the water).

The New York Times

Guitar was added to others.

The New Yorker

Stain was added to enhance the image.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

What was added to May's withdrawal agreement?

The Guardian

Following, PBS was added to prevent dehydration24.

Nature

Jitter was added to x-axis coordinates.

Nature

That history was added to this week.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase, ensure the sentence structure clearly identifies what was added and what it was added to. Clarity prevents ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the relationship between the elements.

Common error

Avoid using "was added to" in active voice constructions where a more direct verb might be more appropriate. For example, instead of "The document was added to the file by John", use "John added the document to the file" for a more concise sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was added to" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something received an addition. Ludwig confirms its widespread usage. Examples show its application in various contexts, from scientific experiments to news reports.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

38%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was added to" is a grammatically sound and very common passive voice construction used to describe the inclusion of something with something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in scientific and news contexts, with a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, ensure that the sentence structure is clear and that the voice is appropriate for the context. Consider alternatives such as ""was included in"" or ""was appended to"" depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was included in

Focuses on inclusion within a set, rather than a general addition.

was incorporated into

Suggests a more integrated addition, becoming part of a whole.

was appended to

Implies adding something at the end or as a supplement.

was supplemented with

Highlights the addition of something to complete or enhance.

was attached to

Indicates a physical or logical connection.

was joined to

Emphasizes the act of connecting or uniting.

was affixed to

Implies firmly attaching something, often physically.

was merged with

Focuses on combining two or more things into one.

was layered onto

Suggests adding something in layers or strata.

was superimposed on

Indicates placing something on top of or over something else.

FAQs

How can I use "was added to" in a sentence?

You can use "was added to" to indicate that something has been included or appended to something else. For example: "A new section "was included in" the report" or "More sugar "was supplemented with" the recipe".

What are some alternatives to "was added to"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was included in", "was appended to", or "was incorporated into" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was added to"?

While "was added to" is grammatically correct, using the active voice might result in a more concise sentence. For example, instead of "The ingredient was added to the mixture", you could say "They added the ingredient to the mixture".

What is the difference between "was added to" and "was attached to"?

"Was added to" generally indicates inclusion or supplementation, while "was attached to" implies a physical or logical connection. The choice depends on whether you're describing a combination or an attachment.