Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was held at
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'was held at' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to indicate the place or location of an event or activity. For example: The annual school fair was held at the local community center.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It was held at the Commodore Hotel.
News & Media
The session was held at Russian request.
News & Media
The reception was held at the Camelback Inn.
News & Media
Service was held at Dodge-Thomas Funeral Home.
News & Media
Cancer researcher was held at Boston airport.
News & Media
Liquid dilution rate was held at 0.12/h.
Science
The rubber phase volume including occlusion was held at 23%.
Science
Interment was held at Litchfield Connecticut Cemetery.
News & Media
Visitation was held at Clavin Funeral Home.
News & Media
It was held at the community pool.
News & Media
The reception was held at Remi. 32.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was held at" to clearly indicate the location where an event, meeting, or activity took place. It's suitable for both formal and informal contexts.
Common error
Avoid using "is hold at" or "will hold at" when describing a past event. Ensure the verb tense aligns with the timeline you're referencing; "was held at" indicates something that has already happened.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was held at" functions as a passive construction indicating the location of an event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's used to specify where something occurred. This construction emphasizes the location more than the actors involved.
Frequent in
News & Media
38%
Science
35%
Academia
27%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was held at" is a very common and grammatically correct phrase used to denote the location of a past event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to provide information about where an event took place. Its versatility allows it to fit across various contexts, from news reports and academic papers to more casual communications. While alternatives like "took place at" exist, "was held at" remains a clear and effective choice.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
took place at
Replaces the passive voice with an active one, emphasizing the event itself rather than the location.
occurred at
A more formal and neutral alternative, suitable for reports and official documents.
was located at
Focuses on the physical location of the event.
was staged at
Suggests a planned or organized event, often used for performances or exhibitions.
was hosted at
Emphasizes the role of a host or venue in accommodating the event.
was based at
Implies a more permanent or regular connection to the location.
happened at
A more informal and general way to indicate where something took place.
was situated at
Describes the position of the event in a more geographical or spatial context.
was celebrated at
Suggests a festive or commemorative event.
convened at
Commonly used to describe gatherings like conferences, meetings, or summits.
FAQs
How do I use "was held at" in a sentence?
Use "was held at" to specify the location of a past event. For example, "The conference "was held at" the convention center."
What are some alternatives to "was held at"?
Alternatives include "took place at", "occurred at", or "was located at". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "is held at" instead of "was held at"?
No, "is held at" implies a regularly occurring event. "Was held at" indicates a single event in the past. To describe an event that happens regularly, use "is held at" or "takes place at."
What's the difference between "was held at" and "was hosted at"?
"Was held at" simply indicates the location. "Was hosted at" implies that the location provided some form of accommodation or support for the event. It emphasizes the role of the host or venue.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested