was located at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was located at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the specific place or position of something in the past. Example: "The historical building was located at the corner of Main Street and Second Avenue."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was located at 722 Sycamore Street, on Buffalo's East Side.

The New Yorker

It was located at the northeast corner of Chambers St. & B'way.

The New Yorker

The studio of Cosmopolitan Productions, a Hearst enterprise, was located at 126th St. and 2nd Avenue. and 2nd Avenue

The New Yorker

"Marijuana was located at the scene, along with at least $100,000 in cash.

The New York Times

The plenum was located at the bottom.

International Journal of Industrial Chemistry

Site T4 (Mode Gakuen Cocoon Tower) was located at Tokyo.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

However, the IRI-TEC trough was located at higher latitudes.

Earth, Planets and Space

FW-TDI60 was located at the end of grouping.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Its hypocenter was located at Lat. 32.7539°N, Long.

Earth, Planets and Space

Target speech was located at a fixed position (90°, 45°), while interference speech was located at (90°, 90°).

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

The inner edge of the torus was located at (r_{mathrm{in}} = 6.0) and the maximum density was located at (r_{max} = 12.0).

Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the location of an event or discovery, consider adding details that provide additional context for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "was located at" when describing a current location. Instead, opt for "is located at" to reflect the present.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was located at" functions as a verb phrase indicating the past position or location of something. Ludwig AI affirms its correct usage in written English for specifying a past location.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

19%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was located at" is a verb phrase used to accurately specify a past position or site. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across various contexts. While mainly neutral to formal in register, it is exceptionally common in scientific and news-related content. To enhance clarity, consider using context-specific details with "was located at". Remember to use "is located at" for present locations. Explore alternatives like "was situated at" to fine-tune your expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was situated at

Replaces 'located' with 'situated', implying a more permanent or established position.

was positioned at

Uses 'positioned' instead of 'located', suggesting a deliberate placement.

was based at

Employs 'based' to indicate a headquarters or primary operating location.

was found at

Replaces 'located' with 'found', implying discovery at a particular place.

had its location at

Adds a possessive structure, emphasizing the subject's association with the location.

was established at

Implies a more formal or official setting up at the specified place.

was centered at

Indicates that the subject's main focus or activity was at the specified place.

could be found at

Adds an element of possibility or discovery to the location.

resided at

Uses 'resided' to suggest a dwelling or habitation at the specified place.

sat at

Replaces 'located' with 'sat' implying the position of an object.

FAQs

How can I use "was located at" in a sentence?

Use "was located at" to describe where something existed in the past. For example, "The original store "was located at" 123 Main Street."

What are some alternatives to "was located at"?

Alternatives include "was situated at", "was positioned at", or "was based at", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "is located at" instead of "was located at"?

The correct choice depends on the time frame. Use "is located at" for current locations and "was located at" for past locations.

What's the difference between "was located at" and "is situated at"?

"Was located at" generally refers to a past position, while "is situated at" often implies a more permanent or established current position.