Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was hailed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was hailed" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when someone is being praised, applauded, or greeted enthusiastically. For example: The new mayor was hailed as a hero when he arrived at the city hall.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was hailed on once".

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was hailed as a breakthrough.

News & Media

The Economist

Sharon was hailed as a military hero.

Walker was hailed by Rush Limbaugh.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But it was hailed as revolutionary.

News & Media

The Economist

It was hailed as a clever stroke.

News & Media

The Economist

He was hailed as a saviour.

News & Media

Independent

The film was hailed as a masterpiece.

IT WAS hailed as "Australia's own car".

News & Media

The Economist

It was hailed as a "miracle product".

News & Media

The Guardian

Thursday's announcement was hailed by environmentalists.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, follow "was hailed" with 'as' and a noun or phrase describing the reason for the acclaim. For example, "The discovery was hailed as a breakthrough."

Common error

Avoid using "was hailed" in informal settings or when describing minor achievements. It's best reserved for situations where there is widespread approval or significant recognition.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was hailed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject received widespread praise or acclamation. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which identifies the phrase as correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Encyclopedias

10%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Science

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was hailed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote widespread approval or recognition. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it effectively communicates that a subject—be it a person, event, or idea—received significant positive attention. Predominantly found in news media and encyclopedic contexts, its register leans towards neutral to formal. While powerful, it's crucial to reserve its usage for scenarios warranting genuine, widespread acclaim, steering clear of informal or trivial contexts. Alternatives such as "was celebrated" or "was praised" can offer subtle variations in meaning. The term's prevalence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Economist underscores its reliability in formal writing.

FAQs

How do I use "was hailed" in a sentence?

Use "was hailed" to indicate strong public approval or recognition. For example, "The new policy was hailed as a victory for the environment." /s/new+policy

What can I say instead of "was hailed"?

You can use alternatives like "was celebrated", "was praised", or "was acclaimed" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was hailed" in formal writing?

Yes, "was hailed" is appropriate for formal writing when describing significant achievements or widespread positive reception. It is commonly found in news articles, academic papers, and official reports.

What's the difference between "was hailed" and "was considered"?

"Was hailed" implies public approval and celebration, while "was considered" simply means something was thought of in a particular way, without necessarily implying positive sentiment. The term "was considered" does not indicate acclaim.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: