was acclaimed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was acclaimed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something received praise or recognition, often in the context of art, literature, or performance. Example: "The novel was acclaimed for its innovative storytelling and deep character development."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It was acclaimed from the first.

The Guardian - Books

The work was acclaimed by discerning audiences.

The Guardian

She was acclaimed, and another tour took place in 1908.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Like Mandela, Arafat was acclaimed the father of his country.

The New Yorker

He was acclaimed wherever he dared show himself in public.

The New York Times

As chief executive of the Football Association he was acclaimed.

The Guardian - Sport

You're Dead!, which came out in October 2014, was acclaimed.

The Guardian - Music

Her book was acclaimed by Germaine Greer and much discussed.

The Guardian

She refused, and the resulting restraint was acclaimed by critics.

The Guardian - Film

Until Still Alice, that is, which was acclaimed almost universally.

The Guardian - Film

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

During the late 1970s, April Greiman was acclaimed for her postmodernist experimentation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was acclaimed" when you want to emphasize that something or someone received strong positive recognition or applause from a broad audience or critics. Ensure the context clearly indicates the source or nature of the acclaim.

Common error

Avoid using "was acclaimed" without specifying who or what group offered the acclaim. Saying "The project was acclaimed" is less informative than "The project was acclaimed by industry experts."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was acclaimed" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that the subject received strong approval or praise. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's used to express that something or someone has been recognized positively.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Wiki

30%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Academia

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was acclaimed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote strong positive reception or recognition. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples of its use across various contexts. The phrase is commonly found in news, encyclopedias, and wiki articles, suggesting a generally neutral to formal register. Remember to clearly attribute the source of acclaim to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received high praise

Emphasizes the act of receiving praise, differing in the active voice.

was highly praised

Uses a different adjective to describe the level of praise.

garnered acclaim

Replaces "was acclaimed" with a verb implying the collection of praise.

met with widespread approval

Focuses on the broad acceptance rather than explicit praise.

enjoyed critical success

Highlights success from critics specifically.

was celebrated

Suggests a more festive or public acknowledgement of success.

earned recognition

Focuses on the act of gaining acknowledgment.

was lauded

Uses a more formal and literary term for praise.

gained prominence

Indicates an increase in importance or visibility due to positive reception.

stood out

Highlights the subject's distinction and positive reception without specifically mentioning praise.

FAQs

How can I use "was acclaimed" in a sentence?

Use "was acclaimed" to indicate something or someone received significant positive recognition. For example: "The film "was acclaimed" by critics for its originality."

What are some alternatives to "was acclaimed"?

You can use alternatives like "was praised", "received high praise", or "enjoyed critical success" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "was acclaimed" or "received acclaim"?

Both "was acclaimed" and "received acclaim" are correct, but "was acclaimed" is a passive construction, while "received acclaim" is active. The best choice depends on the desired emphasis and sentence structure.

What's the difference between "was acclaimed" and "was appreciated"?

"Was acclaimed" suggests a higher level of public praise and recognition, often by critics or experts. "Was appreciated" implies general liking or gratitude, but not necessarily widespread public recognition.