Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was gathered by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was gathered by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the source or method by which information or data was collected or assembled. Example: "The data for the research study was gathered by a team of experienced scientists over a period of five years."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Solano's drive was gathered by Wright.
News & Media
Data was gathered by means of telephone interviews.
Science
It was gathered by Ali Lauiti'iti, who fed McGuire.
News & Media
Peer reviewed literature containing original work was gathered by searching three databases.
Science
The information was gathered by means of a questionnaire directed to clients of Portuguese spas.
Quantitative data was gathered by pre, post, recall tests and an attitudinal questionnaire.
The food was gathered by going house to house in the village to beg.
News & Media
He'd gotten away with it: his family was gathered by the pool, cooing over baby Holly.
News & Media
The data was gathered by using the questionnaire survey and analysed by the internal consistency and correlation analysis.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
2 human-written examples
This data was gathered by the reporter.
News & Media
Information on cohabitation and children at home was gathered by questionnaire.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was gathered by", ensure the agent or method of gathering is clearly stated to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. For example, "The data was gathered by a survey conducted in five major cities."
Common error
Avoid overusing the passive voice with "was gathered by", as it can sometimes make your writing sound vague or less direct. Consider using the active voice when appropriate for more impactful communication. For example, instead of "The information was gathered by the team", try "The team gathered the information".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was gathered by" functions as a passive construction, indicating the agent or method through which something was collected or assembled. As Ludwig AI states, this construction is grammatically correct and usable in written English. Examples from Ludwig show its use in contexts ranging from scientific research to news reporting.
Frequent in
Science
62%
News & Media
33%
Academia
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was gathered by" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase to indicate the source or method of data collection. As per Ludwig AI, this is a correct and usable option across different contexts. It is particularly prevalent in scientific and news reporting, which makes its tone formal and neutral. While versatile, it's important to ensure clarity by explicitly stating the agent or method of gathering. Consider using active voice constructions for direct and impactful writing. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "was gathered by" in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was collected by
Emphasizes the act of bringing things together into a group or collection, similar to gathering.
was obtained by
Focuses on the act of gaining or procuring something, often implying effort or a specific method.
was acquired by
Highlights the process of coming to possess something, often through purchase or effort.
was compiled by
Suggests a systematic arrangement of information from various sources.
was assembled by
Implies the putting together of different parts or pieces to form a whole.
was derived from
Focuses on the origin or source from which something is taken or developed.
was extracted from
Highlights the act of taking something out of a larger source.
was sourced from
Emphasizes the origin or supplier of the information.
was furnished by
Suggests that the information was provided or supplied.
was provided by
Similar to 'furnished by' but places emphasis on the act of giving the information
FAQs
How can I use "was gathered by" in a sentence?
The phrase "was gathered by" indicates the source or method of collection. For instance, "The evidence "was gathered by" environmental activists", or "Data "was gathered by" means of telephone interviews".
What are some alternatives to "was gathered by"?
Alternatives include "was collected by", "was obtained by", or "was acquired by", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was gathered by"?
While "was gathered by" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct. Instead of "The data "was gathered by" the researchers", consider "The researchers gathered the data".
What's the difference between "was gathered by" and "was obtained by"?
"Was gathered by" typically implies a collection from various sources, whereas "was obtained by" suggests gaining or procuring information through a specific method or effort. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the collection process or the acquisition of the information.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested