Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was acquired by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was acquired by" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You use it to indicate that someone or something has become part of another person or organization. For example, "The company was acquired by a global conglomerate in 2019."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
was purchased by
was taken over by
was merged with
was obtained by
came under the control of
was subsumed by
was consolidated into
became the property of
was accrued by
was secured by
was generated by
was required by
was manufactured by
was procured by
was incorporated by
was participated by
was created by
become acquired by
was gained by
ended up selling to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Instead, the company was acquired by CBS.
News & Media
Reble.FM was acquired by Playlist.com.
(Landmark was acquired by Halliburton in 1996).
News & Media
(Aegis was acquired by Dentsu in March).
News & Media
The site was acquired by M.C.
Encyclopedias
GitLinks was acquired by software company Infor.
Academia
This week Ravel was acquired by LexisNexis.
Academia
MapQuest was acquired by America Online in 2000.
Encyclopedias
Texaco was acquired by Chevron Corporation in 2001.
Encyclopedias
In 1997, BBN was acquired by GTE.
News & Media
Interpore was acquired by Biomet in June.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was acquired by", ensure that both the acquired entity and the acquiring entity are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using active voice when the passive voice is more appropriate to emphasize the entity being acquired. For example, instead of "Company A acquired Company B", use "Company B was acquired by Company A" when focusing on Company B.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was acquired by" functions as a passive voice construction indicating a change of ownership. It emphasizes the entity that underwent the acquisition rather than the acquiring entity. Ludwig AI confirms this common usage across various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
54%
Academia
21%
Encyclopedias
14%
Less common in
Science
7%
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was acquired by" is a grammatically correct and very common way to describe a change in ownership, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Predominantly used in the passive voice, it emphasizes the entity being acquired. You'll find it most often in news reports, academic papers, and encyclopedic entries. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify both entities involved. While "was acquired by" is generally neutral to professional in tone, remember to tailor your language to the specific context. Alternatives such as "was purchased by" or "was taken over by" can offer subtle differences in meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was purchased by
Indicates a direct transaction where one entity bought another.
was bought out by
Indicates a purchase of all outstanding shares or a controlling interest.
was taken over by
Suggests a more forceful acquisition or a change in management control.
was merged with
Implies a joining of two entities to form a single, new entity.
was obtained by
Suggests a broader sense of gaining ownership, not necessarily through purchase.
came under the control of
Highlights a shift in authority and management.
was assimilated by
Implies absorption into a larger entity, losing its original identity.
was subsumed by
Similar to assimilated, but suggests a more complete incorporation.
was consolidated into
Indicates a merging into a larger, more unified structure.
became the property of
A formal way to state a change in ownership.
FAQs
What does "was acquired by" mean?
The phrase "was acquired by" means that a company, asset, or entity has been purchased by another company or entity, resulting in a change of ownership and control.
Which is correct, "was acquired by" or "acquired by"?
Both phrases are correct, but they serve different grammatical functions. "Acquired by" is used in active voice constructions (e.g., "Company A acquired Company B"), whereas "was acquired by" is used in passive voice constructions (e.g., "Company B was acquired by Company A").
What are some alternatives to "was acquired by"?
Alternatives include "was purchased by", "was taken over by", or "was merged with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
How to use "was acquired by" in a sentence?
You can use "was acquired by" in a sentence to indicate that a company or entity has been purchased by another. For example: "The startup was acquired by a larger corporation."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested