Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was further validated

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was further validated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the confirmation or support of a previous finding or assertion, often in a research or analytical context. Example: "The initial hypothesis was further validated by subsequent experiments that produced consistent results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Hypo1 was further validated by test set and cross validation method.

This fact was further validated by the clustering analysis.

This method was further validated with hematoxylin-eosin and Prussian blue microscopic histology.

This decision was further validated when the results in Table 3 were obtained.

Ultimately, the proposed method was further validated by analysis of real environmental water samples.

The proposed mechanism was further validated by electrochemical experiments at TiO2-NTs/SnO2-Sb/PbO2 anode.

The reduced mechanism was further validated with experiments involving excessive NOx enrichment.

The model was further validated using residual stresses data measured using the X-ray diffraction method.

The model was further validated by comparing its predictions with other experimental scenarios.

This stimulation effect was further validated by the 7-h batch tests.

The generated model was further validated by enrichment studies using the decoy test.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was further validated" to emphasize that additional steps were taken to ensure the reliability and accuracy of a finding, method, or model.

Common error

Avoid using "was further validated" when the subsequent information merely restates the original validation without adding new evidence or methods. Instead, provide the new supporting details directly.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was further validated" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject has undergone additional confirmation or verification. Ludwig AI examples illustrate its use in scientific contexts, confirming hypotheses, methods, or models.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was further validated" is a common and grammatically correct expression, predominantly used within scientific literature to denote that a preceding claim or finding has undergone additional scrutiny and confirmation. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and highlights its frequent use in academic contexts. Alternatives such as "was additionally confirmed" or "was corroborated" can be employed to add nuance, while writers should avoid using the phrase redundantly. This phrase serves to build confidence in the presented information, making it a valuable tool in formal and scientific communication.

FAQs

How can I use "was further validated" in a sentence?

You can use "was further validated" to indicate that an initial finding or claim has been confirmed through additional evidence or methods. For example, "The initial hypothesis "was further validated" by subsequent experiments that produced consistent results."

What are some alternatives to using "was further validated"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was additionally confirmed", "was also corroborated", or "was independently verified", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was further validated" in formal writing?

Yes, "was further validated" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in scientific and academic contexts where it's important to emphasize the rigorous confirmation of results.

What's the difference between "was validated" and "was further validated"?

"Was validated" indicates an initial confirmation, while ""was further validated"" implies that additional steps were taken to reinforce the initial validation with new evidence or methods.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: