was corroborated

USAGE SUMMARY

'was corroborated' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that the evidence or statement in question has been confirmed or verified. For example, "The testimony of the witness was corroborated by other evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The proposal was corroborated also numerically.

Optics Communications

Moreover, the informant's story was corroborated by other sources.

Cornell University

This result was corroborated by XRD.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Dr Courville's diagnosis was corroborated by the other two neurosurgeons.

The Guardian

His assertion was corroborated by an Iraqi Army officer.

The New York Times

This was corroborated in Mr. Sharon's subsequent statement.

The New York Times

This finding was corroborated by the results of psychophysical test.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

The increase in reflectivity was corroborated in confocal mosaic images.

Biomaterials

Expression of survivin following transfection in mouse cells was corroborated.

Immunobiology

Their structure was corroborated by means of the rhenium complexes.

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Phase inversion was corroborated by transmission electron microscopy.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was corroborated" when you want to emphasize that a statement or finding has been confirmed by independent evidence or sources. It adds credibility to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was corroborated" for simple confirmations that don't require independent verification. Opt for simpler terms like "was confirmed" or "was verified" in less formal contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corroborated" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a previous statement, claim, or finding received confirmation or support from additional evidence or sources. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

38%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was corroborated" is a passive verb phrase used to convey that something has been confirmed or supported by additional evidence. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. It is most frequently found in scientific and news contexts to establish credibility and trustworthiness. When writing, use it to add weight to statements and findings by indicating that they have been independently verified. Alternatives include "was confirmed", "was verified", and "was substantiated". Overusing the phrase in simple confirmations should be avoided, as it might sound overly formal in less critical contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed

Simple substitution of "corroborated" with "confirmed" offers a direct synonym with a slightly different emphasis.

was verified

Replaces "corroborated" with "verified", suggesting a check for accuracy and truth.

was validated

Similar to "verified", but with an emphasis on establishing the soundness or legitimacy.

was substantiated

Indicates the provision of evidence to support the statement, rather than just confirming it.

was borne out

An idiomatic phrase meaning that something was proven to be true.

was supported

A broader term indicating that something received backing or justification.

was attested to

A more formal way of saying that something was confirmed as being true.

was authenticated

Suggests something was proven to be genuine or real.

was reinforced

Indicates that something was strengthened or made more convincing by additional evidence.

evidence supported

Reverses the structure, focusing on the evidence providing the support rather than the statement being supported.

FAQs

How can I use "was corroborated" in a sentence?

You can use "was corroborated" to indicate that a statement or finding has been supported by evidence. For example, "The witness's testimony "was corroborated" by forensic evidence."

What can I say instead of "was corroborated"?

You can use alternatives like "was confirmed", "was verified", or "was substantiated" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was corroborated" or "is corroborated"?

"Was corroborated" is used for past events, while "is corroborated" is for present or ongoing situations. For example, "His account "was corroborated" yesterday", versus "His account "is corroborated" by current findings."

What's the difference between "was corroborated" and "was supported"?

"Was corroborated" implies confirmation by independent evidence, whereas "was supported" suggests general backing or agreement. Corroboration adds a stronger element of verification. You might say, "The hypothesis "was supported" by initial data, and later "was corroborated" by a larger study".