Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was exploited

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was exploited" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that someone took advantage of a situation or a person in an unfair way. For example, "The vulnerable woman was exploited by the money-lender."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Even their exploitation, seemingly, was exploited, in books like "The Dionne Legend: Quintuplets in Captivity".

News & Media

The New York Times

He was exploited".

News & Media

The Guardian

And then, that was exploited.

News & Media

The New York Times

"With each job, I was exploited more.

News & Media

The New York Times

Their multifaceted potential was exploited by publishers.

An E. coli expression system was exploited.

The bad news was exploited by her new acquaintances.

News & Media

The Guardian

Whether she was exploited was a harder question.

News & Media

The Economist

This second route was exploited in a special way.

(Even then, Mes Aynak was exploited for its copper).

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

This property was exploited to map the HA epitope targeted by 5F8.

Science

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was exploited", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what was exploited and who or what did the exploiting. This adds clarity and impact to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was exploited" in passive constructions where the agent (the one doing the exploiting) is unclear. This can weaken your statement. Instead, specify who did the exploiting to make your writing more direct and impactful.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was exploited" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject of the sentence was the recipient of an action – in this case, exploitation. Ludwig confirms this is correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Academia

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was exploited" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase that carries a negative connotation. According to Ludwig, it suggests unfair usage or manipulation for someone else's advantage. It is commonly found in news, scientific articles, and encyclopedias, with a neutral to professional tone. The key to effective use lies in clearly identifying the subject and agent of the exploitation, avoiding ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "was taken advantage of" or "was manipulated" to fine-tune your message. "Was exploited" has multiple examples from Ludwig, which confirms its accuracy and utility in diverse writing contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "was exploited" in a sentence?

You can use "was exploited" to indicate that someone or something was unfairly used for another's advantage. For example, "The workers "were exploited" by the company's unfair labor practices".

What are some alternatives to using "was exploited"?

Alternatives include "was taken advantage of", "was used unfairly", or "was manipulated". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean when something "was exploited"?

It means that something or someone was used in an unfair or selfish way, typically for profit or personal gain. This often implies a power imbalance where the exploited party is vulnerable.

Is it always negative to say something "was exploited"?

Yes, the phrase generally carries a negative connotation, implying unethical or unfair use. However, it can be used neutrally in technical contexts, such as discussing how a software vulnerability "was exploited" by hackers.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: