Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were exploited

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were exploited" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where individuals or resources were taken advantage of or used unfairly. Example: "The workers were exploited by the company, receiving minimal pay for their long hours."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

New coal mines were exploited.

"Now they say there were exploited".

News & Media

The New York Times

I thought we were exploited by the Labour Party.

"It doesn't feel right knowing people were exploited".

News & Media

The New York Times

The Cachan squatters, he adds, were exploited for political ends.

News & Media

The Economist

White settlers were given spacious farms, while the indigenous blacks were exploited as cheap labor.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"Did you never feel as though you were exploited at all?" "No, not really".

Related, the final decree states: Launching programmes to rehabilitate youths who were exploited in various crimes.

Under the old feudalism, the peasants were exploited; under the new arrangement, they'll merely be superfluous.

News & Media

The New Yorker

All the major social media platforms were exploited in different ways.

News & Media

The Guardian

The Socialists told Peru's street vendors and bus drivers that they were exploited proletarians.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were exploited", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what was exploited, and by whom or what. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "were exploited" is a passive construction, avoid overuse of passive voice in your writing. Too many passive constructions can make your writing sound weak or unclear. Consider rewriting the sentence in active voice for a more direct and impactful statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were exploited" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of being exploited. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were exploited" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to describe situations where individuals or resources were unfairly used or taken advantage of. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is fine and appropriate. It carries a negative connotation, suggesting injustice or unethical behavior. It's frequently found in news, science, and encyclopedia sources, demonstrating its applicability across various domains. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who or what was exploited and by whom. Consider active voice alternatives for a more direct and impactful style.

FAQs

How can I use "were exploited" in a sentence?

Use "were exploited" to describe situations where someone or something was unfairly used for another's benefit. For example: "The workers "were exploited" by the company."

What is a synonym for "were exploited"?

Alternatives include "were taken advantage of", "were used unfairly", or "were manipulated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "were exploited" and "were used"?

"Were used" is a more neutral term, while "were exploited" implies an unfair or unethical use. If the use was simply functional without any negative connotations, "were used" is more appropriate. If there was an element of unfairness or taking advantage, "were exploited" is more accurate.

Is it always negative to say something was "exploited"?

Yes, the term "exploited" inherently carries a negative connotation. It suggests that something or someone was used unfairly, selfishly, or to an excessive degree. If you intend to describe a positive or neutral utilization, consider using alternatives like "utilized", "employed", or "leveraged".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: