Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was estimated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was estimated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how a particular value or measurement was calculated or determined using a specific method or tool. Example: "The total cost of the project was estimated with the help of advanced software tools."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

CFR was estimated with TTE and dipyridamole.

The best-fit substitution model was estimated with PartitionFinder30.

Science & Research

Nature

The mutagenicity activity was estimated with the Ames fluctuation test.

Dietary intake was estimated with a validated, self-administered diet history questionnaire.

Science & Research

Nature

Survival from time of discharge was estimated with Kaplan Meier curves.

Science & Research

Nature

Forage intake was estimated with makers (chromic oxide and acid insoluble ash).

Fractional labeling of CO2 was estimated with much higher precision of about ±0.001 to ±0.005.

The surface mobility by contacting water was estimated with static contact angle measurement.

Number of bacteria at the surface was estimated with fluorescence microscopy inspection.

When the diet was estimated with silverside CC, a higher presence of silverside (~ 97%) was observed.

Also the effectivity of this standardized regimen was estimated with the questionnaire.

Science

Acute Pain
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was estimated with", ensure that the method or tool used for estimation is clearly specified to provide context and credibility to the estimation process.

Common error

Avoid using "was estimated with" without specifying the method or data used. For example, instead of writing "The cost was estimated with a model", specify the type of model used: "The cost was estimated with a regression model".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was estimated with" functions as a passive construction indicating that a particular value or quantity underwent estimation. Ludwig examples show its use in scientific and technical contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was estimated with" is a grammatically correct and very common construction used to describe the method by which an approximate value was determined. Ludwig AI confirms the correct and widespread use of this phrase, particularly in scientific and technical contexts. When employing this phrase, it is crucial to specify the exact method or tool to ensure clarity and credibility. Alternatives such as "was calculated via" or "was determined through" can be used to add variety to your writing. Be clear and precise when describing your methodology.

FAQs

How can I use "was estimated with" in a sentence?

Use "was estimated with" when you want to indicate that a value or quantity was determined using a specific method or tool. For instance, "The population size was estimated with capture-recapture methods".

What are some alternatives to "was estimated with"?

You can use alternatives like "was calculated via", "was determined through", or "was derived using" depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "was estimated with" and "was measured with"?

"Was estimated with" implies an approximate calculation, while "was measured with" suggests a more precise, direct measurement using an instrument or tool. For example, volume can be estimated and length can be measured.

Is it correct to say "was estimated by" instead of "was estimated with"?

Both "was estimated with" and "was estimated by" can be correct, but they convey slightly different meanings. "Was estimated with" emphasizes the tool or method used, while "was estimated by" typically emphasizes the person or entity performing the estimation.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: