was disrupted by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was disrupted by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that an event or process was interrupted or interfered with by someone or something. Example: "The conference was disrupted by unexpected technical difficulties, causing delays in the schedule."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The route between Holborn Viaduct and Herne Hill was disrupted by 62 incidents during the war.

Wikipedia

The route was disrupted by countless military checkpoints.

The Guardian

This sense of imperial destiny was disrupted by industrialism.

The Guardian

The monk industry was disrupted by the Reformation.

The Guardian - Opinion

Last Wednesday afternoon the first drop in the dusty town of Zubayr was disrupted by gunfire.

The Guardian

One test, conducted last spring during the Arizona primary, was disrupted by computer problems.

The New York Times

Slave labor was used, and New Netherland's growth was disrupted by wars with American Indian tribes.

The New York Times - Arts

That authority was disrupted by the interval, with the initiative was taken back immediately thereafter.

The Guardian - Sport

Degenaar said the violence started after a students representatives council meeting was disrupted by protesters.

The Guardian

Watson's second half of 2014 was disrupted by a series of injuries.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

The cell debris was disrupted by sonication, and Ni-NTA agarose was added.

EMBO Molecular Medicine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase when you want to emphasize the cause of an interruption or disturbance, rather than just stating that something was interrupted.

Common error

Avoid using "was disrupted by" vaguely. Always ensure that the cause of the disruption is clearly and specifically identified to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "The project was disrupted", specify "The project was disrupted by unexpected budget cuts."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was disrupted by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject experienced an interruption or disturbance caused by an external factor. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. The examples show it describing how events, plans, or processes are negatively impacted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was disrupted by" is a grammatically sound and common passive construction used to describe how an event, plan, or process was interrupted or negatively affected by an external factor. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal communication. When employing this phrase, clarity and specificity regarding the cause of the disruption are crucial. Remember, alternatives like "was interrupted by" or "was affected by" can provide nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was interrupted by

Replaces "disrupted" with "interrupted", maintaining a direct synonym.

was interfered with by

Substitutes "disrupted" with "interfered with", emphasizing an external intervention.

was hampered by

Uses "hampered" instead of "disrupted", suggesting an impediment to progress.

was hindered by

Replaces "disrupted" with "hindered", indicating an obstacle or difficulty.

was affected by

Uses "affected" instead of "disrupted", broadening the impact to any kind of influence.

was disturbed by

Substitutes "disrupted" with "disturbed", focusing on a break in peace or order.

was thrown off course by

Emphasizes a deviation from the intended path due to an external force.

was derailed by

Uses "derailed" instead of "disrupted", creating a more negative connotation of something failing.

suffered a setback due to

Changes the structure to highlight the negative consequence (setback) and the reason for it.

was undermined by

Indicates a weakening or diminishment of something due to an external factor.

FAQs

How can I use "was disrupted by" in a sentence?

Use "was disrupted by" to show that an event or activity was interrupted or disturbed by something. For instance, "The concert "was disrupted by" a sudden rainstorm".

What can I say instead of "was disrupted by"?

You can use alternatives like "was interrupted by", "was affected by", or "was hindered by" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "was disrupted by" or "disrupted by"?

"Was disrupted by" is a passive construction and requires the auxiliary verb "was". "Disrupted by" may be correct in different contexts, such as a heading or a fragment of a sentence.

What's the difference between "was disrupted by" and "was interrupted by"?

While both indicate a break in continuity, ""was disrupted by"" often implies a more significant disturbance or disorganization, whereas "was interrupted by" can be a more temporary pause.